heynowbababooey
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 2,381
- 2,420
If Tampa is over the salary cap by 18mil why are they being allowed to get away with it? Has this ever happened before?
If Tampa is over the salary cap by 18mil why are they being allowed to get away with it? Has this ever happened before?
They're over the regular season cap number, but there's no cap in the playoffs so it's all legal.Wait, Tampa is OVER the cap? How has no one brought this up til now?!?!
They are not over, because there is no salary cap in the playoffs.If Tampa is over the salary cap by 18mil why are they being allowed to get away with it? Has this ever happened before?
The only time I saw this rule used to « cheat » was when Chicago made up a skin disease for Hossa that never existed to place him on LTIR.
I mean their narrative was that he was suddenly allergic to a hockey equipment he wore all his life
Maybe the rest of the NHL should have done something about it when Yzerman proposed it 6 years ago.Tampa didn't break express rules, but they've made an effective mockery of them.
A form of the salary cap should apply during the playoffs. If it doesn't, we have to rely on the honor system that players are legitimately unable to come back (until the eve of game one, no less).
Except you take on those cap hits in order to get something. If it costs you nothing in effect, what's the point of a cap?Being salty about Kucherov and his $8.5M is one thing, but including Gaborik and Nilsson who will never play a game for the organization is just silly
He was…
Maybe so but better late than never.Maybe the rest of the NHL should have done something about it when Yzerman proposed it 6 years ago.
It's almost like that would be politically unpopular.I wonder how some people on this board feel about big corporations using perfectly legal loopholes to avoid paying taxes.
I agree, but I’m sure some of the same teams who were against it are the ones facing Tampa in the playoffs this year so it’s hard to have sympathy for them here.Maybe so but better late than never.
Allow me to doubt that one. That allergy showed up when he was heavily declining and not when he was a star player ?
Seems awfully convenient and if it’s true, I don’t believe much effort was put to bring it back to the lineup as there would have been if he was still a star player.
( There are a lot of treatment available to get rid of allergies )
That's all conjecture at this point, and I'm not interested in who gets moral superiority here. Just that we all recognize this is bullshit when we see it and fix it going forward.I agree, but I’m sure some of the same teams who were against it are the ones facing Tampa in the playoffs this year so it’s hard to have sympathy for them here.