Ohashi_Jouzu*
Registered User
It's kinda interesting how this list so closely follows our perceptions that are based on watching them, though, isn't it?
Look who's on top: Hasek, Potvin (who, for two seasons, was a top-5 goalie), Roy, Joseph, Belfour, Vanbiesbrouck.
Look who's close: Hebert, Richter, Essensa (who, for two seasons, was a top-10 goalie), Puppa, Terreri, Irbe, Barrasso.
Look at the next tier: Moog, Ranford, hextall, Casey, McLean, Beaupre, Burke.
clearly sv% statistics in this five-year period do a pretty good job of illustrating who was performing and who wasn't.
Racicot could have been worse than his sv% indicated (there are plenty of cases of this) but also it's undeniable that his ineptitude was exacerbated by playing in Montreal, and having an elite starter (Patrick Roy, .909) to be compared to.
Follows closely, yes. But when you look below him and see Tugnutt (clearly a better goalie) at 41, and heck, Hayward at 52, I'm not fooled at thinking this ranking maintains any kind of "accuracy" past spot 20 or 25. Different goalies, at different points in their careers, and backups who faced very different levels of competition compared to the starters they played behind.
I get your point, but again, don't let the stats lead you astray. Racicot was worse between the pipes than most guys on that list not named Pat Jablonski or Peter Ing. Getting dubbed "Red Light" is probably a factor of playing in Montreal (as you mention), and while he may not be THE goalie in history most deserving of that nickname, he certainly earned it.