Confirmed Trade: [SJS/MIN] Kaapo Kahkonen and 2022 5th round pick for Jacob Middleton

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
25,333
11,950
California
Crazy to me Middleton even made it. Was highly touted as a 16/17y/o. Had a mediocre draft year and was Mr.Irrelevant at one point in time. Then proceeded to go unsigned and earned a contract with Sam Jose.

Real good story.
Even in SJ he was never seen to be anything over a 6/7D as late as last season.
 

Mattb124

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
6,576
4,016
To me and I may be out in left field here but this seems like an absolute steal for SJ.
Middleton is a pretty solid player, just a late bloomer so he doesn't have much of a reputation. Steady D/PKer with a touch of offense. While people are calling him a bottom pairing d-man (and he might be that in MIN), he has been #3 in D ice time in SJ with Ferraro out (~19 mins/game). He is also one of only two Sharks regulars who are in the + this season and leads the team in that category (+3). And while he fights, he is better at hockey than at fighting.
 

Kcoyote3

Half-wall Hockey - link below!
Sponsor
Apr 3, 2012
12,626
11,229
www.half-wallhockey.com
To me and I may be out in left field here but this seems like an absolute steal for SJ.
It could be, depends on what happens with Kakhonen's contract, as well as how he plays here. He has a great track record of success which is key though. Liiga, AHL, etc. and just now getting settled as an every day NHL goalie. I like the swing on his upside.

Middleton is great at slowing the game down and getting the puck out of high danger areas in the d zone. He has the ability to get it to a better puck moving defenseman and get it out. My only worry is that he could be a flash in the pan since he hasn't really been hugely successful before this. He was good in the AHL, but not spectacular. If he signs a big contract this summer for 3-4 years, by year 2-3 teams could be saying "so why do we pay you more than 2 million?". Then it goes from a success story to fans thinking he's worse than he is.
 

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
25,958
11,022
Seems weird that Minnesota gave up on him so quickly. Like, yeah...you've got two starting goaltenders now, but it seems a little short-sighted. This guy is young, and Talbot and Fleury are both not young. They're not going to be the answer going forward.

Just makes the Fleury acquisition even more strange to me. That doesn't seem like the place they ought to have been going out spending their deadline capital. And it cost them their potential sort of "future in net" with this follow-on side deal. Weird.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MessierII

Joseph Nathan

Registered User
Feb 11, 2022
698
319
Seems weird that Minnesota gave up on him so quickly. Like, yeah...you've got two starting goaltenders now, but it seems a little short-sighted. This guy is young, and Talbot and Fleury are both not young. They're not going to be the answer going forward.

Just makes the Fleury acquisition even more strange to me. That doesn't seem like the place they ought to have been going out spending their deadline capital. And it cost them their potential sort of "future in net" with this follow-on side deal. Weird.
He was bound to be a backup in 1-3 years with jasper wallstedt.
 

Circulartheory

Registered User
Apr 22, 2006
6,759
721
Hong Kong
Maybe. Banking on goalie prospects like that is always dangerous though. When you have a good young goaltender like that, it's usually a good idea to try to hold onto them.
He's been with the org for 4 years, we kinda have a good grasp of him behind a Wild sweater, a good 1B goalie.

He might flourish somewhere else but I feel he is what he is. He doesn't have the size, the quickness, or the mental consistency to take up the top goalie spot.
 

TaLoN

Red 5 standing by
Sponsor
May 30, 2010
50,880
24,546
Farmington, MN
To me and I may be out in left field here but this seems like an absolute steal for SJ.
Kahk has been awful... he's young though and could become a solid backup, but I've been convinced for some time that he'll never be a true starter in this league.

He definitely wasn't going to be worth his next contract in Minnesota with the coming cap constraints either.
 

matt trick

Registered User
Jun 12, 2007
9,798
1,414
Kahk has been awful... he's young though and could become a solid backup, but I've been convinced for some time that he'll never be a true starter in this league.

He definitely wasn't going to be worth his next contract in Minnesota with the coming cap constraints either.

Any rumours of what that contract might look like, or is this a scenario where with tight cap you want to see an ultra-cheap backup in the $750k-$1.5M range.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad