If that was the case, MAF would've been pulled last night. He was pretty brutal IMO and would've cost them the game without tremendous goal support.
If I see him go down on his knees, paddle down when a guy goes in the corner again......... ......and stays there as the guy brings it out front...... Top of the net is ALWAYS wide open there.
Can't wait for Jesus Greiss to save us from this.
Is Malkin playing wing permanent?
Without a doubt, he is a question mark.
I know im gonna get flamed for this ....
He definitely makes his blunders. He definitely makes his gaffes. He is definitely mentally fragile.
But I honestly believe that if the Dzone coverage tightens up more; if the D doesnt give guys enough time to set up and have tea and a scone in front of the net, etc etc .. it will mitigate enough of his blunders.
I often wonder how MAF would play on a team like Nashville where they are SO defense oriented and give VERY little to the opposition and conversely, how would someone like Rinne play on an "offense first, defense second" team like the Pens.
Im not saying MAF would go there and win the Vezina but I guarantee his numbers would be better.
Tighten things up and I think MAF will do a good enough job to give us a chance to win.
Is Malkin playing wing permanent?
Another plus from last night .. did anyone see the Potash / Dupuis interview?
Gotta say .. Dupes is pretty amusing. "Thanks Daaaaan." lol
Potash is like the kid brother that always wants to be hanging with the older kids. He thinks they like him hanging around but it seems that he is just there for their amusement.
Cause the point of my post was TOTALLY about Potash and not at all about Dupes.
If the way the team executed in the second period, until Fleury decided to make things interesting, a sign of things to come, this should be a fun season. Without a doubt the best the team, as a whole, has looked with possession in a long time.
Still, the game was quite symptomatic of an early season game, some good, some great and some bad mostly due to the lack of timing, automatism and chemistry.(particularly evident in the first period, which should have been much closer scoring wise had Gibson not crap the bed.)
Also I liked our mentality, the way we pressured with the lead at the end.
On a side note, not that I care much, but Johnston' system certainly won't help Fleury's stats : on any good night, we probably won't give up many shots but a high percentage of them will probably be great scoring opportunities.
I don't think I've seen Malkin that badly misused in a long time.. I don't think it's really worth commenting any further. Ah si, just one thing, I though Spalling and Downie looked good, put them on a line with him and go from there.
I've not seen many comments on Sutter but he struggled quite a bit, about the only Pens that had a hard time with Malkin and to a lesser degree Martin and Scuderi.
The Pk was way too much passive but gotta give it to the Ducks, they have a real great PP(puck movement, personnel) so we'll see how it evolves.
You can see Johnston' system put a lot of emphasis on your dmen(mostly) and centers being able to make plays from their own end, in that aspect he couldn't come to a better team. It's like Shero had foreseen that when he drafted and signed all those great Ds that were misused by Bylsma.. More seriously, the more I see them play, the more Johnston looks like a great choice from Mario and co.
Kasperi Kapanen @kasper1kapanen 4m4 minutes ago
I told Olli to score lots of points, I guess he took my advice?
Puck support. Is this a new concept in hockey? I don't believe I've seen the Penguins under Bylsma utilize this breakthrough strategy.
@OtherNHLCrosby
Malkin said he doesn't feel great and isn't in great shape, but is glad to be done with the injury.
Funny you mentioned Sutter, i also thought he was very pedestrian, lost bunch of pucks all in all not the best performance (not that i worried about that) but all the genious hockey minds today are talking about his great game ( just because he scored that shortie). just tells you that these guys really don't pay attention and don't care they just make s... up
Not sure if this has been posted...but the best quote from DK's column.
"If you freeze the frame right there, that’s important in and of itself, as the Penguins were quicker to move the puck out of their zone than the norm under Bylsma, in part because defensemen only needed to look 50 or 60 feet up ice — or less — rather than the standard 110 feet of the get-to-our-game range."