Sempiternal
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2014
- 3,460
- 1,944
Ovechkin has never had a better season than Crosby. You could make an argument that one of his was equal early on.Maybe if Crosby played every game of every season he wouldn’t be a PPG player every season?
The grind is part of your career.
Also averaging 46 goals per season over your (almost) 15 season career is way more impressive to me.
And not for nothing but Ovechkin has been better than Crosby more seasons than he has not, so how does that square up with him being “better”?
Consistently great never really dominant.
Ovechkin has never had a better season than Crosby. You could make an argument that one of his was equal early on.
People think single seater racing is no different to driving an family car, driver fitness/weight is a huge factor, to be able to withstand the forces and heat.Because they're able to drive at an average speed more than double what you'd go for on a highway, in tight corridors, without killing themselves?
I'm guessing though
This is it.
There's not been that obvious wide chasm between him and his peers in the same way you've seen with Messi, M. Schumacher, Lebron, Pre-2008 Tiger, Floyd Mayweather, Federer/Nadal/Djokovic, Serena Williams, Lewis Hamilton, Rossi, Bolt, Phelps.
He's been at the tip of what has been tremendous generation of hockey players, and as harsh as it is, it does count against him that a team-mate who plays in the same position also has collected hardware in this league (and also had a dominant season).
5 championships he lead his teams to. Face of the league for over a decade. Back to back Conn Smythes. 5th GOAT
5? Are you really counting the Olympics? That’s almost like citing Michael Jordan’s “Dream Team” gold medals as evidence of his greatness.
Also, most people seem to agree that at least one of his Conn Smythes are undeserved.
5? Are you really counting the Olympics? That’s almost like citing Michael Jordan’s “Dream Team” gold medals as evidence of his greatness.
Also, most people seem to agree that at least one of his Conn Smythes are undeserved.
I'll assume you were kidding.... Ovechkin has had multiple seasons better than Crosbys...
how does that post-season head to head check out?
Great question! Head to head Ovechkin has outperformed Crosby in the playoffs by a decent margin:
Ovechkin: 14 G, 15 A, (23 primary points), 29 points in 22 games, plus 6
Crosby: 11 G, 13 A, (16 primary points), 24 points in 21 games, plus 5
Head to head in the playoffs Ovechkin has more points than Crosby
Ovechkin also outscores Crosby when his line matches up directly with Sid's:
Crosby vs Ovechkin - On-Ice Stats
Ovechkin is also the best individual playoff performer of this generation on a per game basis:
Top Offensive Players Since 2005, Using an Objective Scoring System
And yet, Ovechkin has only beaten Crosby once. I’ll go with the winner & the far more complete player.
those are part of the equation since Ovechkin was also involved. And in regards to the Conn Smythes the league disagrees. Its MVP of the entire playoffs, not the Final. Point is, Crosby gets it done when it counts the most.
Three years old & still accurate...
There's no denying Crosby's status as one of the best in NHL history
In which universe is 2 Art Ross Trophies and 2 Hart Trophies in 15 years "dominant"? He was one of the best hockey players over that decade. But he was far from dominant.
As for the team success. Well actually there are a couple of Canadian players that have a similar resume. Heck even some swedish players are close in that regard.
Gretzky was dominant, Late 80es-mid ninetees Lemieux was dominant. 94-2001 Jagr was dominant. But Crosby? Not really. Far too many injuries, far too few trophies to showcase.
Even some of those trophies have reputation bias written all over it. And Stanley cups? Malkin has the same amount. Crosby owes him one of those Conn Smythes, in my mind. Not everyone is fortunate enough to be able to play for team Canada, either.In which universe is 2 Art Ross Trophies and 2 Hart Trophies in 15 years "dominant"? He was one of the best hockey players over that decade. But he was far from dominant.
As for the team success. Well actually there are a couple of Canadian players that have a similar resume. Heck even some swedish players are close in that regard.
Gretzky was dominant, Late 80es-mid ninetees Lemieux was dominant. 94-2001 Jagr was dominant. But Crosby? Not really. Far too many injuries, far too few trophies to showcase.
those are part of the equation since Ovechkin was also involved. And in regards to the Conn Smythes the league disagrees. Its MVP of the entire playoffs, not the Final. Point is, Crosby gets it done when it counts the most.
Three years old & still accurate...
There's no denying Crosby's status as one of the best in NHL history