MilesNewton
Registered User
- Jul 7, 2019
- 1,595
- 441
Depending on how the guys in IR progress if Toronto is willing to trade him since he is under producing
should the Ducks try to work a deal?
should the Ducks try to work a deal?
I don't see Bob trading anything of value (which we'd need to do) for a non-cost controlled guy who might walk. Forward or defenseman, what is the point of that in a season like this one?
A team in our position has no business pursuing rentals. That's just pissing away assets for the sake of the "do something" crowd.
Only with an extensionDepending on how the guys in IR progress if Toronto is willing to trade him since he is under producing
should the Ducks try to work a deal?
I am going to contest thisHe’s a rental who will get $7M + next season. He fills a need but we can’t afford him.
I am going to contest this
If Bob Murray was willing to extend Faulk for a potentially high number, that means we could possibly afford Barrie
Dude WTF. I had no idea Gudbranson was still making that much. We're paying that much for a f***ing bottom pairing dman?that was before we took on Gudbranson and his $4M for next year.
I would also expect Barrie to get more than Faulk.
Dude WTF. I had no idea Gudbranson was still making that much. We're paying that much for a ****ing bottom pairing dman?
Well I mean somebody had to replace the cap hits that Allen, Stoner snd Bieksa once had...
Id rather have Risto than Barrie... I think risto could be really effective with Lindholm or fowler.