TD Charlie
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2007
- 36,562
- 16,548
This 100%
Maybe slightly off-topic, but the one thing that I always found interesting was people talk about all the amazing saves Thomas had. The interesting part is he made routine saves look difficult because he positioning was not always great i.e. at times he made things look harder than they were. On the flip side Rask is a positionally sound goalie and because of it makes difficult saves look routine. Thomas had a fantastic run when they won the cup, no question, but he wasn't the sole reason the Bruins won the cup like many make it seem.
Thomas 2011 - 1.98 GAA / .940 SV% / 4SO
Rask 2013 - 1.88 GAA / .940 SV% / 3SO
^One guy is blamed by many for not winning a cup in 2013 and the other is considered the reason the team won it all in 2011
i love Rask, i like him over Thomas. Buuuuut
one of them posted a goose egg in back to back game 7’s to win the cup, the other threw up on himself twice and visitors lifted the cup in Boston...twice
for the question, not a chance. Two dominant seasons and a godlike playoff run. Otherwise i feel like his career was fairly average, often times quite bad.