The plan was always to sign Nylander first, signing Marner prior was never going to work. You're going to give Mitch more than Willie and he's going to be fine with that? Never. If we could have signed Nylander in the summer, we may well have had Marner locked up as well, depending on us projecting improvement this year. Given Nylander basically got it all in the end, I do wonder why it was such a long process, and it's fair game whether we've erred with Marner now.
Is there really anyone who thinks Marner's agent wouldn't have done 8-8.5 this off season. I think he would have, let's not forget that was a huge number when people talked about Mitch, most were still in the 7's, 8 tops. I articulated an urgency to sign Marner, it seemed obvious he was poised to go beast mode this year. The hang up was Nylander first, and it went on so long, everything else was put back, which looks worse with each passing primary assist, goal or takeaway.