Confirmed with Link: Sharks sign Ryan Merkley to ELC

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,386
13,800
Folsom
In terms of what? Straight line speed? Boyle was an amazing skater.

Boyle was a great skater in terms of being elusive but in terms of speed he wasn't great but good. Merkley could probably be better speed-wise while also having Boyle's elusive skating ability.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
47,666
16,546
Bay Area
Yeah, I see a lot more of Dan Boyle in him than I do Brent Burns. Boyle's vision seems underrated at this point but that stuff Merkley does was stuff that Boyle was doing a lot of. Merkley looks like he could be a better skater but Boyle had a lot of elusiveness in his skating game that I think Merkley would have to grow into. I also agree defensively but it took Boyle a very long time to get to his defensive peak as well.

Oh for sure. I mean, Boyle was undrafted and didn’t really catch on until his second team. I don’t think his development curve can be compared to Merkley. I just mean that IF (big if) Merkley hits his highest potential, he’s basically Dan Boyle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doctor Soraluce

Mattb124

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
6,569
3,995
Oh for sure. I mean, Boyle was undrafted and didn’t really catch on until his second team. I don’t think his development curve can be compared to Merkley. I just mean that IF (big if) Merkley hits his highest potential, he’s basically Dan Boyle.

I am not sure if i buy into the rationale that a first rounder with ~10 skill who fell to 21 due to character issues who hits his highest potential will at best be equal to an undrafted Dan Boyle.
 

WTFetus

Marlov
Mar 12, 2009
17,904
3,558
San Francisco
I am not sure if i buy into the rationale that a first rounder with ~10 skill who fell to 21 due to character issues who hits his highest potential will at best be equal to an undrafted Dan Boyle.

Undrafted has nothing to do with peak ability. Tyler Johnson? Martin St. Louis? Would you say the same if a first round goalie was said to be have a peak equal to Bobrovsky?
Dan Boyle at his peak was a #1D.
 

Mattb124

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
6,569
3,995
Undrafted has nothing to do with peak ability. Tyler Johnson? Martin St. Louis? Would you say the same if a first round goalie was said to be have a peak equal to Bobrovsky?
Dan Boyle at his peak was a #1D.

Let's not unnecessarily confuse the issue. What I am saying is that Merkeley is substantially better than Dan Boyle was at the same age, so I am not sure any support exists for the assertion that, if Merkeley hits his highest potential, he cannot be a better player than Dan Boyle. The kid already has some elite tools in his vision, passing, and skating.
 

Maladroit

Registered User
May 9, 2018
980
437
Berkeley, CA
Let's not unnecessarily confuse the issue. What I am saying is that Merkeley is substantially better than Dan Boyle was at the same age, so I am not sure any support exists for the assertion that, if Merkeley hits his highest potential, he cannot be a better player than Dan Boyle. The kid already has some elite tools in his vision, passing, and skating.

Dan Boyle was a phenomenal player at Merkley's age. He scored 81 points in 53 games in Canadian Junior A at Merkley's age then went on to put up fantastic numbers for a defenseman at Miami of Ohio. If a prospect with Boyle's numbers were eligible for the 2018 draft he would have been a top 10 pick. The league has drastically changed in the past 25 years since Boyle went undrafted, especially when it comes to undersized defensemen. Boyle wasn't some late bloomer, teams were just really stupid (and in fairness there were more legitimate concerns about whether a small defenseman could survive in the mid-90s NHL).
 

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
24,936
6,125
ontario
Dan Boyle was a phenomenal player at Merkley's age. He scored 81 points in 53 games in Canadian Junior A at Merkley's age then went on to put up fantastic numbers for a defenseman at Miami of Ohio. If a prospect with Boyle's numbers were eligible for the 2018 draft he would have been a top 10 pick. The league has drastically changed in the past 25 years since Boyle went undrafted, especially when it comes to undersized defensemen. Boyle wasn't some late bloomer, teams were just really stupid (and in fairness there were more legitimate concerns about whether a small defenseman could survive in the mid-90s NHL).

Yeah boyles lateness into the nhl had nothing to do with skill. He was under 6'0 tall and i believe at that time like 160lbs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Juxtaposer

Maladroit

Registered User
May 9, 2018
980
437
Berkeley, CA
Yeah boyles lateness into the nhl had nothing to do with skill. He was under 6'0 tall and i believe at that time like 160lbs.

Yeah just looking at the numbers Boyle played in the same league as Cale Makar in their respective draft years and he outscored Makar despite being nine months younger at the time of the draft. Makar went 4th overall last year. Boyle was almost certainly a better prospect in his draft year than Makar was. It was just a different NHL back then.
 

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
24,936
6,125
ontario
Yeah just looking at the numbers Boyle played in the same league as Cale Makar in their respective draft years and he outscored Makar despite being nine months younger at the time of the draft. Makar went 4th overall last year. Boyle was almost certainly a better prospect in his draft year than Makar was. It was just a different NHL back then.

I know nothing about scoring in university but i highly doubt even back then or even now there is not many point per game defensemen
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
47,666
16,546
Bay Area
I am not sure if i buy into the rationale that a first rounder with ~10 skill who fell to 21 due to character issues who hits his highest potential will at best be equal to an undrafted Dan Boyle.

So what if Boyle was undrafted? He was a legitimate #1D in his prime and perhaps the best PPQB in the league. Are you suggesting that Merkley has higher upside than that? Who cares if Merkley is better at the same age (not necessarily true!)? If Merkley turns into a Boyle clone, we should all kneel at the alter of DW Jr.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StanleyCup2035

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
88,326
31,699
Langley, BC

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
88,326
31,699
Langley, BC
Even 20 years ago ottawa failing hard. Sheesh.

The top 5 in 1993 was Daigle, Pronger, Chris Gratton, Paul Kariya, and Rob Niedermeyer. Not that Neidermayer or Gratton were world-beaters, but basically anyone from that batch would've been better than Daigle.

and #6 was the Sharks pick and was Viktor Kozlov. Which, as I've discussed at length before, still lives on in the Sharks' bloodline through Thornton, Tierney, and Balcers.

They did manage to snag Pavol Demitra in round 9 of that draft. So that's something.
 

sampler

Registered User
Aug 3, 2018
293
197
Merkley is a clone of Goldobin in terms of style. Slender, fast, highy skilled, and defensivel pourous with some question of work ethic and character. I remember being very happy they drafted Goldobin. I did not want another Petrecki-type big physical, yet lower skilled and boring guy. With the exception of cooch, dougie has not drafted a consistent 50+ point player since his first draft is 2003 (pavelski). A few guys have hit 50 points (michalek, clowe, seto...), but noone has established themselves as a perennial top liner. I really want to see the sharks go for a top liner. So, Goldy was either gunna be a superstar or suck. Unfortunately, it seems closer to the latter, and now hes gone.

Merkley will either learn the defensive game, get stronger, and be the next ryan ellis or Torey Krug (or Dan Boble as mentioned)... Or... he'll find himself in the press box for the Cuda after being a complete sieve. Sommer has no patience for players who dont commit defensively, so Merkley is a project, not so unlike Jeremy Roy. Sommer has a big job developing those two, but Merkley will be a home run or complete strike out. Again, Im just fine with that trade-off picking in the 20s. That's the place to go for it....

(as an aside, I am quite interested in what Jon Leonard may become. He had a hell of a freshman year at Umass, and he and ferraro look very interesting. The sharks own the leading scorer and leading defenseman on that team, both accomplishing that as freshman. That's pretty remarkable... I'll be following that team closely this year, and if those two improve, it's gunna be the big steal of the draft out of the 6th round.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sharksrule04

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
47,666
16,546
Bay Area
Merkley is a clone of Goldobin in terms of style

This seems like a weird statement but I kind of agree, although not in the way you probably intended.

I was watching some highlights of Merkley and one thing struck me as extremely similar to Goldobin, and that’s that he just on such a higher level creatively than any of his teammates that they just don’t see a lot of what he does coming. Some of the passes he makes are just so next level that the perma-juniors/ECHL types just don’t have the anticipation or creativity to see them coming.

Obviously Goldobin had a lot of flaws that prevent him from being an NHLer, but his creativity and offensive IQ were not one of them. Even in the AHL, he was next level in that regard.
 

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
24,936
6,125
ontario
Merkley's rookie tournament performance shows why he's...

“We’re probably three years away (from Merkley playing in the NHL) — what’s he going to be like in three years, when he’s doing this stuff now?” Sommer said. “A lot of stuff (Boyle) did, this guy is doing at 18.”

Isn't merkely 2 or 3 years away from playing in the ahl? If so that 3 year number is a good thing. It will mean sommer doesn't have long enough to destroy merkely.
 

seroes

Registered User
May 3, 2016
2,919
1,762
California
Isn't merkely 2 or 3 years away from playing in the ahl? If so that 3 year number is a good thing. It will mean sommer doesn't have long enough to destroy merkely.
Pretty sure he is 2 years away from being eligible to play in the AHL. Not 3.
 

Internazionale

Registered User
Apr 24, 2007
1,941
766
Airdrie, AB
We all know that he has to improve his defensive game. 2-3 years away from the NHL shouldn't come as a big shock to anyone. Scary to think how he'll be offensively in 3 years time with all the mentoring and tutoring he will receive. I'd take an elite offensive defenseman like Boyle anytime .
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad