Rumor: Sharks offering Evander Kane a mid to long-term deal

[Djp]

Again it depends on the unknown language in the trade clause.

For all we know the clause could say SJ owes a 1at round pick if “Kane is on the SJ roster anytime during the 2018-19 season”.

Thats the $64,000 question

League will penalize san jose if the violate the spirit of the deal which means he is on their 18/19 roster.

Remember they traded a player, 2nd and 4th so to dodge giving up a 1st they lokely give up more in a sign and trade. It would cost at least a 2nd if not more.

 

[jbell886]

 

[THall4]

Perhaps the Sharks were informed Tavares won't be hitting UFA, which compelled them to start get serious with Kane extension talks?

Wishful thinking my man.

They still have cap space ...plus they will probably bury Martin (or trade him) so that another 4.8M
And they can/should walk away from Jumbo, unless he will re-sign for a very cap friendly deal

Kane - JT - Pavelski
Hertl - Couture - Labanc
Meier - Jumbo - Donskoi

that's a pretty sick top 9

 

[Price is Wright]

If the rumour is true, "mid to long term" sounds like two offers. Maybe a 3 year offer at $6M and a 5 year offer at $6.5M.

 

[rent free]

Numbers may be in the 7-years 7-million per range.

the contract can range from good to terrible

 

[CupInSIX]

give him 7x7 San Jose.

 

[YearlyLottery]

Wishful thinking my man.

They still have cap space ...plus they will probably bury Martin (or trade him) so that another 4.8M
And they can/should walk away from Jumbo, unless he will re-sign for a very cap friendly deal

Kane - JT - Pavelski
Hertl - Couture - Labanc
Meier - Jumbo - Donskoi

that's a pretty sick top 9

But I thought the idea was Joe picking Tavares up and showing him around?

 

[HawkeyTalkMan]

Yea not sure how "mid term" was floated out there when he landed on 7x7

 

[mouser]

Thats the $64,000 question

League will penalize san jose if the violate the spirit of the deal which means he is on their 18/19 roster.

Remember they traded a player, 2nd and 4th so to dodge giving up a 1st they lokely give up more in a sign and trade. It would cost at least a 2nd if not more.

League would go by the letter of the trade. Remember all trades and conditional clauses have to be registered and confirmed with the NHL.

There is no “spirit of the deal” that the NHL would penalize a team over. It’s simply not the league’s responsibility to enforce something like that.