ThePhoenixx
Registered User
- Aug 7, 2005
- 9,316
- 5,804
Woohoo!
Only me and 144 others got it right!
Only me and 144 others got it right!
Same hereWoohoo!
Only me and 144 others got it right!
Metoo moment..Woohoo!
Only me and 144 others got it right!
Metoo moment..
gonna say it here too. Lots of late voters. heh. Before series started the biggest group were saying 5 games. wonder how many changed votes?
I think both teams were better. However one has incredible star power.Hard to tell if the Oilers improved so much from last year to this year, or if the kings got much worse. Series felt like a grind, but it wasn't all that close considering both the King's wins came off terrible reffing with a bit of a push from the ever unreliable NHL situation room. A far cry from last year where they had the Oilers on the brink by the end of game 5. Also seems like the Kings went from low-key dirty last year, to passive with a ton of diving this year. Considering Edmonton absolutely blitzed them on the powerplay, might have been the right decision overall, but it feels like the Kings had a ton less swagger this year and were playing not to lose rather than doing everything in their power to win.
Not sure about the King's future either. Their key guys are getting older, but their top draft picks are trending towards busting. From the outside looking in, the fans calling for Blake's firing might have a point. Though, as an oiler fan, I do hope whatever they do, they keep Mclellan incase the Oilers play them again in the playoffs next year