Hello guys. Thought I should explain myself and clear a few things up.
He got curb stomped right back.
This tweet was from June of 2015. Herman tried to act as if this information was between himself and a scout only, when in reality that scout posted it publicly on twitter over a year ago.
I'm not exactly sure how you came to the conclusion that "I spoke to a scout recently" meant I was referring to a blog post from Cody from over a year ago. I've known Cody for a number of years and always cited his work when I was using information from his blog.
To reiterate, I had a conversation with a professional hockey scout in Western Canada about a month ago and that is what he told me.
As for why I care about the plagiarism: I spend my own money and an unhealthy number of hours watching 30+ NYR prospects every season. Then, I dedicate even more time and energy in speaking to players, scouts, agents, coaches, etc to gather more information and perspective. So when I publish my thoughts or insight gathered from all of that hard work, I'd like to get properly credited for it.
It's one thing to copy people's thoughts for a blog or a project you are trying to gain notoriety or make money from, but a discussion forum? Eh, not really buying that as cause for Adam Herman to cry plagiarism. If I was him, I'd be stoked. It means that people are being influenced by him. As long as it doesn't cross over to people using their personal byline before posting those thoughts in a blog or article, or trying to profit, I don't see the big deal about a few forum users posting unoriginal thoughts.
If we want to get legal, maybe "Oscar Lindberg" isn't trying to gain notoriety or make money by passing off my content as his. However, HFBoards' terms of service states that they effectively own all posts on the forum. THEY are making a financial gain off of plagiarized work under their possession.
But whatever. This is more of a pragmatic call to reason. I'm flattered that this guy was influenced by me, but guess what: there are 3,000+ people who have read this thread and would not have been able to "be influenced by me" as well thanks to the lack of attribution. And this is not the first time it has happened. I've seen my work inadequately attributed or completely plagiarized on this forum and a few others a number of times now. Again, I put countless hours into learning about and evaluating these 30+ prospects. I don't think it's unreasonable to request that someone take five seconds to type out my name or copy-and-paste a link.