HoseEmDown
Registered User
- Mar 25, 2012
- 17,470
- 3,690
In the post you quote I calculated the cap space for the scenario, that Paquette and Killorn are traded without taking more than minimum contracts (700k) back, run a 20 man roster and there won't be the 9.5 million AAV available for your bridge deal proposal. So I think they need to move at least one of Gourde, Palat and Johnson, which all have a full NTC. For those players some of the same questions are valid:
Why would they want to leave a cup contender?
Why would they leave sunny income tax free Florida?
And league wide, over half the league is in a Cap Problem, so why would they lift their NTC to play for one of the bottom feeders with Cap?
And the next summer won't be any easier, if the cap stays flat, as Tampa has to extent or replace their cheapest forwards Coleman and Goodrow. This situation is dynamic and I don't see any simple solution. It will take a lot of work to keep all the players Tampa fans don't want to trade.
If they trade Paquette and Killorn for futures, sign Stephens, Verheaghe, Volkov, Joseph to 700-800k deals and bring up Foote they should have 7.6M to sign the 3 other RFA's. You then mention why would any of the players with a NTC waive to leave sunny, tax free, cup contending Tampa. Why would Sergachev, Cirelli or Cernak do the same and sign an offersheet somewhere else? Sure they won't be getting 6M from Tampa next season but the money is there if they're patient.
Next summer will be a lot better for Tampa. They have Johnson and Palat NTC becoming modified so easier to trade if needed. They will have the expansion draft which hopefully moves out some money. I don't think Tampa brought in Coleman and Goodrow to extend them after next season unless they were willing to take less money than they can get elsewhere. Tampa has all the RFA's they will be signing this offseason as well as Barre-Boulet, Katchouk, Raddysh and Fortier on the way. They could let them both walk and be fine.