- May 30, 2013
- 43,017
- 18,463
And there it is, the crux of all advanced stats discussions. On the other side of the Zipays is advanced stats people that want to come off as sophisticated for seeing the game differently. As I said there's a middle ground. You tote decently well, but you have your head in the clouds if you think that there are no advanced stats activists that judge the entire game by numbers.
Okay, I"m sure there are people that blindly subscribe to possession metrics and nothing else to make hockey judgements. But I feel like those people are A LOT less common than the reverse pundits think they are.
Like implying we will have a Leafs-esque collapse is ridiculous. Saying we're mediocre isn't totally ridiculous, as there are a few stats that would support that notion, but if you pay attention for the most part, you'll feel differently. The problem here is dismissing people that use these stats like they have nothing of value to say, which happens wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too often..