Very disappointed in Norris since the last couple of game he doesn’t skate and look disinterested.
I have said it at the beginning but the line combinations are probably the worst DJ could come up with. It's not a surprise to me that Tkachuk-Norris-Dadonov is not working out
If you look here at 1:19, you see what Norris can do. He permutes to find open space then a perfect pass for the one-timer, Tkachuk missed of course.
Of course, Norris still has a lot to learn but he just seems like a young player that is under coached. He's probably second guessing a lot what he is supposed to do. If you start with the notion that our coaching staff is heavily outmatched, it's easier to understand why most of our players struggle and why it takes time to adjust. It's not surprising that the only guys "not struggling" are the new inserted players, like Brannstrom and Zub for example.
Norris advanced stats are still pretty good for a 21 y/o on a discombobulated team (for the most part). He has to learn and gain experience, even if he has to figure it out himself. I'd rather this to be done THIS year than next. Unless we want to be in a perpetual rebuild, we have to start graduate young players. The only drafted player graduated since 2016 draft is Brady Tkachuk. Stutzle will be next with (normally) Batherson and Brannstrom. Norris should be there too.
This team really needed a veteran Center, it's just that Stepan wasn't the good candidate at all. Take the 2nd given up for him, the 4th used on Josh Brown and Balcers (waived) and you have Balcers + 2nd + 4th. One good piece and you could get a good center, no?
Or the UFA route? I would have overpaid for Mikael Granlund. 1 year, 5.5... he still says no?
Stutzle-Granlund-Dadonov
Tkachuk-Norris-Batherson
Paul-White-Brown
Galchenyuk-Tierney-Watson
Chlapik
Paul-White-Brown is your matchup line, they get plenty of ice-time. You don't have a 1st line but you use the other lines based on performance, go with the hot hand.
This team gets 1-2 high danger chances a game, while we defend quadruple that
Not statisticcally. NST shows we average 11.66 HDCF/60, and we give up the same amount HDCA/60 , which is high event both ways.
Difference is :
- The nature of these chances. We fight hard to create these chances. Defensively, we give up chances on a silver platter, many GA have been GIFT WRAPPED GOALS
- We lack finish. We do create good chances but we didn't elevate the puck enough or simply just missed the shot, whiffed on the puck, etc. Other teams have been way more opportunistic.
We have been doing fine "coriscally". The problem is in the execution. Complete that last pass, don't miss that shot, find a better spot on the goalie, don't mishandle the puck in that situation, etc... That's just offensively.
Defensively there's even more factors but at least we have seen major improvements since that 4-0 Oilers lead 4 games ago.