Why are so many people surprised they don't have energy?
Are they surprised? I don't see a lot of shock. They're just discussing the facts.
Why are so many people surprised they don't have energy?
Third game in a row against Ottawa as the changed up schedule continues since the season started up again. Havent watched a whole lotta the last few games so these lines could be right or wrong. Probably wrong. Its in Ottawa so remember EARLY start time of 4pm
Hoglander Miller Virtanen
Pearson Horvat Macewan
High-More Boyd Brock Boeser
Clamato Sutter Hawrluyk
Hamonic Myers
Edler Schmidt
Hughes Juolevi
Holtby
Siloves
LBL called up maybell play maybe not, probably not
Scratches include:
Apparently this guy is injured
The GM is still:
This guy plays some really good music:
And heres a goal from a few years ago that we all like
Drives me mental how Hughes is constantly fidgeting with his jersey and helmet. Just *****in play
Schmidtt is nowhere near the player Tanev is, big downgrade, never mind should have had both
Hoglander needs a Kesler like shooting improvement. 100 pucks a day on net, start from 0 after each miss.
Virtanen is not good..
Been done with the coaches for a long time. PP is horrible. The entire team refuses to push the play forward, always circling back, stopping to look for a point pass, behind the net to D partners. Always garbage passes to the back hand that cause turnovers or at best slow any momentum. Just skate forward, with some purpose, score on the rush FFS.
It would have been in February..They are as good as any team in the division now..dropping 2 games versus Sens, unacceptable IMO.
At least claw the games to OT if you are going to lose.
It is what it is
Tanev has like close to 0 bad games played in a season and these so called Canucks managers let him walk.
Yeah, MacEwen looks like a guy with zero confidence right now. Which is too bad, as I think he brings a lot of elements we lack and if Green would give him a bit of leeway, I think he could be really effective for us.
And how many goals does Toffoli have? Watching us struggle both defensively and offensively last night, and it’s clear Miller knew exactly what was going on when he made his “shocking” comments about losing our top UFAs.Tanev has like close to 0 bad games played in a season and these so called Canucks managers let him walk.
Don’t really understand Green’s issue with MacEwen. He was effective last year in a 3rd/4th line energy role down the stretch, then got press boxed when the playoffs began and never seemed to recover in the coaches’ eyes.
Vesey, yeah. Cheap depth, but definitely seen enough of him near the top of the lineup.
The packed schedule is already wearing down this team. It sucks, because it means they are very unlikely to be able to go on a run and push for a playoff spot just due to mounting fatigue.
Tanev has like close to 0 bad games played in a season and these so called Canucks managers let him walk.
The packed schedule is already wearing down this team. It sucks, because it means they are very unlikely to be able to go on a run and push for a playoff spot just due to mounting fatigue.
While I could quibble with point 1,2, and 4, I mostly agree.He says this things in very obnoxious ways, but:
1 Hughes has been very weak defensively this season.
2 Petey has been hurt a lot.
3 Horvat is very good (IMO), but he is very inconsistent.
4 Thatcher has a history of injuries every season since he turned pro.
These things may not be pleasant to accept, but hey are facts. If these things remain constants, they will have a negative effect on the outcome of the Canucks future.
1a Will they be able to find another defender who can help make Quinn appear to be a solid NHL defender as Tanev did and no one since has?
2a Can Petey put on some muscle and get physically stronger or is he one of those guys that just seems to have a plastic skeleton? There have been and still are many of them throughout the league.
3a Can Horvat find a way to be the same basic player every night? Not one to score a goal every night, but to be a threat to while helping his line mates be productive as well. He is a center and that 2nd piece is very important. If the whole line is a threat every time they take a shift that makes the Canucks much more dangerous as the opponent has to plan to defend them. If the first line is even more dangerous that's 2 lines that have to be stopped. Now a 3rd line that is also dangerous makes the Canucks a very serious foe to contend with.
These 3 lines are not yet a part of the every game Vancouver lineup.
4a Can the Canucks develop or acquire a 2nd keeper that can come close to matching Demko's game results the way Thatcher and Jacob did. The way Holtby has played of late vs the other half of the season. Thatcher's history says he will likely have the mishaps along the way every season. Someone has to be capable of replacing him when he's out or partnering with him to possibly lessen the possibilities of injury.
Theses 4 issues 1st need to be recognized by management which I'm not sure Benning/Aqualini and Co. do. Once recognized, they need to be addressed by management and coaching in team construction and the systems they play as well as backup systems to utilize when issues arise that cause the team to have deficiencies they can't atone for with roster they have because of them.