2CHAINZ
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2008
- 14,440
- 20,015
Spending more isn't just about UFA's.
Spending more also means being willing to move some redundant players (Prince, Weir, Greening, Chiasson, Mickalek, etc) in a package deal for a guy with a higher price tag than what we're moving out.
If the only trades we can make are money coming in must equal money going out, then we simply don't have the ability to make any deal that's in the best interest of making our team more competitive.
I think you're failing to see the trade market, ottawa isn't the only team that doesn't want to take on extra cap space for the sake of taking on extra cap space. What evidence do we have that a trade didn't happen due to salary ? What trades have happened over the past few seasons that we missed out on that makes us better ? We want to get rid of redundant players which I understand but simply they don't have any value, do we trade one redundant player for another just for the sake of making a trade ? Look at the price of David frikkin Perron does giving up condra + our first rounder for Perron make us better ? I truly don't believe atm there is a trade out there we can make regardless of salary that makes us that much better. I am sure we can take on salary but we need top end talent regardless how you cut it and unfortunately people don't trade top end talent.