Speculation: Secondary Scoring is non existent!

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
Gauthier and Engvall for starters here. 1 Goal and 1 assist each the last TWENTY games. Keefe kept Engvall on the Tavares line for almost 2 shifts and seen enough. Spezza and Kappy are in our bottom six and produce, Clifford adds jam and the rest are taking a pay cheque and doing nothing.

Certainly looks like these guys really don’t get the levity of the situation in our battle for accountability and playoff race with a good Florida team that was really good no so long ago. Florida getting hot and these guys adding nothing to team success is concerning.

Top Six carries this team! Maybe we need to ship some players to the Marlies to send a message. Its really annoying the lack of character these softies are providing
 

Jozay

Registered User
Jul 9, 2012
14,627
10,574
Toronto
Clifford, Gautheir, Malgin, and Engvall pretty much give us nothing offensively.
 

IceColdBear

Registered User
Apr 5, 2016
552
641
We've been missing Johnsson and Mikheyev for a long time.

If we had those two guys in the lineup, our secondary scoring would be a strength.

Those two aren't world beaters, but they can play in a teams top 6, or be very very good 3rd liners providing offense, and they aren't slouches defensively.
 

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
Clifford, Gautheir, Malgin, and Engvall pretty much give us nothing offensively.
Nothing physically either. They don’t wear down opponents. Likely they are to worn down from all the stick waving checks. Rarely do any take the body in any significant way. I think they actually believe they are safe on the team without getting their noses dirty. Thats got to change. I have no tolerance for entitlement on this team. Sick to death of watching these guys take the easy way out. Maybe they have to be out

See how their entitlement feels to them when they are making $70,000 to $100,000 in the minors
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cobra777

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
We've been missing Johnsson and Mikheyev for a long time.

If we had those two guys in the lineup, our secondary scoring would be a strength.

Those two aren't world beaters, but they can play in a teams top 6, or be very very good 3rd liners providing offense, and they aren't slouches defensively.
It still doesn’t negate the lack of anything from the rest. I think they shouldbe demoted
 

Marshy

Behind Enemy Lines
Oct 3, 2007
8,145
9,201
Ottawa
We need the Bobs to come in and clean house.

First question:

"What would you say.....you do here??"
 

All Mod Cons

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
10,276
10,678
That's because most of them make minimum wage. For the most part, you get what you pay for
 

All Mod Cons

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
10,276
10,678
It's funny all the love Engvall gets with his like 12 goal pace, when Johnsson who got 20 in his rookie year everybody wants gone.
Engvall was new. Sale thing happened with Mikheyev, Moore (people wanted him with Matthews), Johnsson, Sandin, Liljegren, Dermott, Campbell, Timashov, Borgman, Frattin and many more.

It only takes half a dozen games for a large portion of the fanbase to label someone a steal
 

67Leafs67

Registered User
Nov 8, 2014
774
631
First of all, we are the highest scoring team in the league. So, calling out our scoring, in any way, shape, or form, as a problem, is kind of odd. Our problem this season has mainly been goaltending & team defense, as well as injury troubles. So, citing scoring, and where it is or isn't coming from, as an issue, is strange.

A few things to consider though.
- Injuries: Currently our 1st & 3rd most productive defenders (Rielly & Muzzin) are out, and our 6th & 8th most productive forwards (Mikheyev & Johnsson). That has a hit on depth production.
- Relative Stats: Not a definitive measure of depth scoring, but only three teams (MTL, VAN, & PHI) have ten players with 0.5+ ppg, and only three teams (VGK, COL, & NSH) have nine players. Toronto also has nine players with 0.5+ ppg. That has us t-4th in the NHL.
- Overall Performances: These are where our players rank (among forwards with 15+ GP) in points-per-game.

First Line (1-93)

13. Matthews (1.16)
16. Marner (1.14)
33. Tavares (0.95)
47. Nylander (0.86)
70. Hyman (0.76)

Second Line (94-186)
132. Mikheyev (0.59) *injured
157. Kapanen (0.54)
179. Johnsson (0.49) *injured

Third Line (187-279)
202. Spezza (0.45)
205. Kerfoot (0.44)

Fourth Line (280-372)
296. Engvall (0.33)
321. Malgin (0.29)
340. Clifford (0.25)

Sub-Replacement (373+)
384. Gauthier (0.20)
398. Petan (0.19)

So we have 11 forwards producing at NHL levels of production, 13 when we are healthy. Looking at our lines, we've got this:

Hyman (3F) - Matthews (1F) - Marner (1F) --> Three first liners, two #1 forwards
Kerfoot (7F) - Tavares (2F) - Nylander (2F) --> Two upper-tier first liners, a high-end third liner
Clifford (11F) - Spezza (7F) - Kapanen (5F) --> Two second liners, a fourth liner
Engvall (10F) - Gauthier (13F) - Malgin (11F) --> Two legit fourth liners, a sub-optimal centre

Because our team is so good on the top-end, the contributions of the bottom end can feel underwhelming, but stacked up against the rest of the league, they are really doing a fine job, especially considering the roles they play, without much PP time, lack of TOI in general, and lack of productive offensive linemates.
 
Last edited:

Stephen

Moderator
Feb 28, 2002
78,722
53,257
Engvall should be used in a shock troop and penalty killing role but not yet relied to do too much else. Kind of regret seeing him get signed for like 3 weeks of good hockey, what was the rush?

Gauthier is pretty disappointing for what little expectations you might have of him. If he were mean and consistently high energy he would be a useful center, but no one really needs a gentle giant who has to look down to handle the puck.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad