Killion
Registered User
- Feb 19, 2010
- 36,763
- 3,217
http://seattletimes.com/html/hockey/2022905302_nhlseattle14xml.html
Seattle times has a article that talks about seattle's chances of an NHL team and gives somewhat of an update on where things are at.
"Sources say there have been negotiations between the league and potential ownership groups in Seattle about the cost of expansion fees. To the point where the NHL and local officials could be prepared to make some type of announcement shortly after the Olympic Games in Sochi conclude — at a time the NHL hopes nationwide interest in its sport will be at a high point. "
Mods: if this text from the article is too much please edit it as i am not sure off hand what is consider acceptable and not.
I'm just speaking in terms of what has happened and what almost certainly would happen. This was an issue in the 90s, especially 1991 with the Sharks entering in the Lindros draft - the owners didn't want a new team coming in and taking a potential generational talent, so San Jose was awarded the 2nd overall pick instead of the 1st.
As I said, I'm in favor of an expansion team being entered in the lottery (which didn't exist in 1991, but did for the late 90s expansion), but not outright being awarded the #1.
At least the NHL has been far more fair about giving expansion teams picks (in the 90s at least) than Major League Baseball is...while Arizona and Tampa Bay were given sandwich round picks in the two seasons leading up to their entering the league (to establish a farm system), they didn't select until the 3rd (Arizona) or 4th round (Tampa Bay) in their expansion seasons of 1998. The Rockies and Marlins got sandwich round picks in their expansion seasons of 1993, but only had one previous draft before entering the league to 'build' a farm system. For those unfamiliar with the MLB Draft - there are sandwich rounds between the 1st & 2nd round and between the 2nd & 3rd round that are either compensation picks or, starting in 2013, 'competitive balance' picks that are awarded via a lottery system. Picks in that 28-40 range hit about as often as NHL 4th rounders do.
That's a good point and make sense.
If your ball is selected how many spots can you move up in the lottery draft? Three or four?
I'd be okay with an expansion team getting the #2 overall pick, but not the 1st. Just don't do what the NBA did to the Vancouver Grizzlies and Toronto Raptors where they were banned from drafting first overall for their first six years.
The expansion draft, IMO, would be more critical than the entry draft. Obviously the number of players the league allows each team to protect would be an impact for the expansion team. Can't expect them to be competitive if other teams are able to protect everyone minus the 4th line and 5th and 6th d-men.
The NFL typically has had their expansion teams get the top picks in their first draft.
About the first part, let's face it, more than half the current crowds weren't around when the last ownership was here. They're in the arena for a winner. They're casual fans. You definitely have core Winterhawks fans... but what happens if there's no Thunderbirds, or if that rivalry is "muted" by NHL Seattle?
Second: the sports business has evolved from selling tickets to selling SEASON tickets. Playing 36 games a year in Moda will chase out the Hawks with the next talent dry spell. Bill Gallacher was the guy who wanted to put $10 million into that glass box, because there would be less rent paid and he'd probably have control of all team revenues. Of course, even the current mayor knows the $30 million plan isn't enough. I'm not disagreeing with the assessment of "the bowl in the box, yo", I'm saying it's a better seating capacity and economic situation for a Portland WHL team if the thing is gutted and reconstructed.
In response to pcspounder.
I don't see why Seattle getting NHL team would hurt the thunderbirds.
Like i have said before WHL is not the same as NHL and WHL ticket prices are far more affordable for someone that wants to see a general game of hockey but can't afford NHL prices.
I kinda expect NHL would help draw more interest in the sport and the WHL teams in the state specifically the two in Western Wa could benefit from it.
In response to pcspounder.
I don't see why Seattle getting NHL team would hurt the thunderbirds.
Like i have said before WHL is not the same as NHL and WHL ticket prices are far more affordable for someone that wants to see a general game of hockey but can't afford NHL prices.
I kinda expect NHL would help draw more interest in the sport and the WHL teams in the state specifically the two in Western Wa could benefit from it.
Season tickets are no longer priced for the center of the population to own for multiple sports... unless you live with your parents, and granted, there's more of that going on.
The media have only the time for the big cheese. That's the NHL, and unlike Vancouver, the Seahawks own even more of the media... which is also to say that Seattle isn't Canada.
Not to mention... the Thunderbirds aren't that good a draw in the first place.
The T-Birds are right in the middle of the pack in WHL attendance this season.....Including 10 Canadian teams lower than them in the rankings. They aren't playing to crickets.
The T-birds are also playing very very good hockey lately too. Currently 4th in conference.
I was listening to the game on the radio tonight. Another T-Birds victory.....clinching a playoff birth.
Excellent.
They were playing in Everett.
Wow not a easy place to play in too.
You know i wonder if the team will rebrand to Kent Thunderbirds after Seattle gets a NHL team
I hope not! All my gear says Seattle lol
Its a good question though.
Of course i rather have local boy TJ Oshie on the team if St louis somehow leaves him unprotected than top pick in the draft.
I would think the NHL would want Seattle to have a top talent player to get things going.
Of course i rather have local boy TJ Oshie on the team if St louis somehow leaves him unprotected than top pick in the draft.