Boondock
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2009
- 5,778
- 2,387
It's tough to say 1 way or the other because you're comparing 2 different styles of play, 2 different positions, and they haven't had the same development path so their stats are tough to compare. I will however say that recent successful NHL teams have been strong down the middle, so based on position I would say Schenn might have the advantage. If you're Pitt's GM you probably take Tarasenko, if you're Toronto's GM you probably take Schenn. I see Schenn being a Mike Richards type player, solid 200 foot game, physical, 70-80 point career high. Tarasenko seems to have more offensive flare, I see him as a Skinner/(young, pre-injured) Havlat. I would be shocked if he wasn't a consistent 35-40 goal scorer in his prime with 50 goal potential.
Either way, both seem to have a fairly bright future in the NHL.
Either way, both seem to have a fairly bright future in the NHL.