This concept that any "shot" can be saved by a goalie is not correct IMO. While I see it as a soft goal my issue is this type of goal could have been avoided by better team defensive play. Our D played that way too soft. We let him skate unimpeded from inside his blue line to inside our face off circle and get a shot on the goalie with no one getting close enough to him to touch him with their stick. I am sorry you can not allow NHL quality players (Hedman is third in scoring for TB) time and space to shoot the puck that close in. Sure it was a back hand but he had time to think, plan and make his shot. It wasn't sliding along the ice but lifted slowly up over pad level perfectly targeted. This was not an easy save, just like the game winner in OT was not an easy save because it was a little off speed and poked up into a spot that the goalie could not reach it with the glove. Personally I give this 70 D 30 goalie.
I am still of mixed mind on the non call with the OT goal. IF I was a TB fan I want that called. I haven't broken down the play but IF Kadri was the one who entered the ice for Mckenon then yeah that is a legit too many men on the ice... but also if TB had a ton of people on the ice as well???? Then I could see a non-call as the ref saw both teams were slow getting off the ice and their was zero advantage one way or the other.
My take on the shot blocking. I really think that it is working for TB and. It was clear we were outskating them game 4 badly and out playing them but all the shot blocks were disrupting our flow. The other aspect of this series that is concerning to me is that time and time again TB has done a better job of getting players unmarked disrupting DK in the crease. While we have practically had zero unmarked presence in the crease. This has lead to TB getting a lot of rebound goals.
It goes both ways.
You can't let the goalie off the hook entirely. Literally any shot that gets on goal is the result of some kind of defensive breakdown. No team, no matter how good, is going to give up zero shots in an NHL game. At some point, the opposition will break through the layers of defense and get a quality scoring chance. That's what the goalie is there for. He needs to come up with the save. Sometimes it needs to be a BIG save, not just a routine one, one that an average goalie would not have.
I will give Darcy credit, that first period he was under siege he only gave up one, and I'm not about to fault him on a goal where his helmet was literally knocked off and the defense in the slot area was beyond atrocious. We can also credit him for not letting the second goal derail his game, but we can still acknowledge that it was a shot he should have had. Both things can be true.
That said, I would like to see a tighter defensive game overall by the Avs. They were way too sloppy in that first period especially. A couple egregiously bad turnovers occurred, at least one by MacKinnon, and another by Byram. Kuemper bailed both of them out.