AlphaLackey
Registered User
For sure. It is important to remember that for all their faults and blunders that one may have, an athlete is still a human. It does not excuse shitty behaviour and some one needs to be accountable for same, but the context is important. It is very easy to hammer away on a keyboard criticizing someone's personality that you don't even know; the internet and forums like this are bad for that. Evander will pay the piper one way of another in terms of being accountable financially, legally, or emotionally. But it is very important to also remember he has kids, and those kids will one day do an internet search on dad only to find innumerable anonymous people ripping the guy a part. I don't think they deserve to read that garbage. They will likely have enough to deal with as far as collateral effects from a very public parental separation.
As long as you have some similar sense of understanding and sympathy for the countless good and decent people that Kane insulted, assaulted, creeped on, stiffed on tips, ditched on tabs, and in general treated not as a human but as a prop, as sociopaths are wont to do, to justify his own selfish behaviour. TL;DR: I guess I just don't see much of a reason why "anonymous keyboard warrior criticizing famous person" is so much worse than "famous person accusing anonymous civilians of moral failure by the millions, as that was preferable to personal accountability".
Like, if the phrase "punching up / punching down" has even the tiniest ounce of credibility, then surely it would apply here to people who are taking delight in the self-inflicted downfall of a (EDIT: formerly) rich, famous, privileged male athlete.
Retaliatory delight as well, I might add.