Joe Hallenback
Moderator
- Mar 4, 2005
- 15,389
- 21,580
Anyone looking at Bennett's point totals as indicative of his ability should look at the situations he was put in. He was not used in an offensive role at all, and was saddled with garbage linemates for 90% of the season.
Yes, because certain posters acting like OKG make all Flames Fans equal to him.
Every single fanbase on this board has bad posters. You choosing to come into pretty much every single thread involving the Flames is interesting though. Whatever helps you feel like a big man on the internet I suppose.
You'd be surprised how many more obnoxious Flames fans there are compared to Oilers fans. I wasn't the one comparing Draisaitl to Bennett. I can give you 3 guesses who it was from the Flames fans but you probably only need 1.
Back on topic, I hope that Bennett gets involved in contract talks sooner rather than later. Personally, I think the Gaudreau contract took longer because JG didn't get involved and left it completely to the agent. He said in interviews he doesn't do anything and leaves everything in the hands of the agent. Once HG got involved (After the season started), the deal was resolved within the week. The agent does not have the same relationship with the Flames (as it should be) as JG has with the Flames org and thus a holdout is IMO more to be blamed on an agent than the player. However, after a certain point, the player should get involved to avoid negotiations completely hitting stale mates.
Ok, maybe it was a bit left field, but people have said Bennett will be better than Draisaitl. He was higher than Draisaitl in the draft rankings and when Edmonton passed on him, everyone from the Flames board jumped on the Oilers because Draisaitl had a 'poor' 1st season and found every possible way to throw it at us. [MOD]
Very strange post considering half the Flames threads get locked because Oiler fans jump in and turn it into a pissing contest. I've barely posted over the past month and this is the 2nd or 3rd time I've read this complaint.
I got many short replies saying less than kind things a Month ago when I suggested Bennett might believe his own hype and could be holding out for a bigger contract. Turns out I was right (or at least on the right track). Whether he gets it or not will remain to be seen but I would be surprised if Bennetts number came in at 2.5 mill per year or lower.
Bennett and Valimaki for Duchene 50% retained??
I comment on a lot of Flames stuff. After the Oilers they are easily the second team I follow the most. And of course more to see them lose than to see them win.
[MOD]
And back to the topic at hand. I still find it odd that the Flames fans can say Bennett is obviously better than a guy like Yakupov, yet they want him to get paid significantly less. Many comments about how Brouwer held him back (who makes 4 mill btw). Many comments about how he has not been put into a position to succeed. Yet I've heard numbers as low as 1.2 mill per year and many Flames fans believe 2.5 x 2 years is the highest Trel will go.
I got many short replies saying less than kind things a Month ago when I suggested Bennett might believe his own hype and could be holding out for a bigger contract. Turns out I was right (or at least on the right track). Whether he gets it or not will remain to be seen but I would be surprised if Bennetts number came in at 2.5 mill per year or lower.
Bennett and Valimaki for Duchene 50% retained??
We won't be able to resign Duchene, he'll be chasing the money. It's better to keep cost-controlled Bennett, who I think will still sign a contract with us. And, we aren't going to trade a pick we just made.
How do you call a player who doesn't even have a contract because he's holding out "cost-controlled"?
He needs to sign a bridge deal and then work his ass off to produce enough to make Calgary not regret taking him at #4.
How do you call a player who doesn't even have a contract because he's holding out "cost-controlled"?
He's an RFA and we hold his rights until he signs something? We ultimately still have an asset. Even if he holds out, we retain his rights and he has a zero cap hit or something like that... I think.
But for Duchene, any assets we send for him, we lose when he walks. He's good, but we cannot afford a rental player. We are severely lacking high picks in the next drafts.
I would do bennett+Andersson for Duchene at 50%, but not valimaki.
Andersson could be just as good or better fwiw, this is just positional preference. (LD vs RD)
Duchene would bolster our offence pretty significantly this year. Worry about retaining him beyond this contract when we see how he fits in.
Are we sure it isnÂ’t the team insisting on a long term deal right now so they can force him to a long term low $ contract?
Duchene is not a rental. Plus he's been linked to Calgary so obviously there is some type of interest there.
Duchene is not a rental. Plus he's been linked to Calgary so obviously there is some type of interest there.