Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
I think the part that pisses me off the most is that I really do like some of these statistics. Some of them I don't consider very significant at all, so meh to those, but some of them genuinely provide us with more information that can be used to paint you a slightly better picture. Oh sure, the image is blurry as hell, and if you're trying to turn it into some high definition picture of what a player contributes, you're forced to make a lot of assumptions and you still have lots of gaps so don't do that, but it's still an improvement.
I just can't abide the ridiculous ways people have misused the statistics, all because they are too lazy to actually watch games of the players they are attempting to analyze. As someone who is focused on electrical engineering, and who loves hard science, it pisses me off to see people trying to cut corners and being unwilling to ask questions they don't know the answer to. There is nothing wrong with admitting you don't know.
I just can't abide the ridiculous ways people have misused the statistics, all because they are too lazy to actually watch games of the players they are attempting to analyze. As someone who is focused on electrical engineering, and who loves hard science, it pisses me off to see people trying to cut corners and being unwilling to ask questions they don't know the answer to. There is nothing wrong with admitting you don't know.