Yakushev72
In terms of decline of Russian performances in the past seven years in WJC, don't underestimate the gains that have been made by competitors like Canada, Sweden, US and even Finland. Except for Canada, the other 3 nations have developed national team development programs that have really improved the quality of their play, especially Sweden and US. Those nations weren't nearly as good or competitive with the big 2 (Russia and Canada) before they began special programs to develop national youth teams. They have had spectacular success since.
Canada didn't need a national development program, because they had 60 major junior teams competing in a high quality league where most teams play the same basic style. They could just sit back and pick the cream of the crop of 25 players for national youth teams. That approach works best for a nation that has a large hockey playing population where the goal is to develop the large available talent pool. Canada has 33 million people, whereas Sweden has 8 and Finland only 5 million. Russia has patterned its youth development program more after the Canadian model with a national junior league (32 teams) that has the potential capability to develop large numbers of talented players. Theoretically, the Russians could select a top-flight player for every roster spot.
The biggest thing the MHL could do, if it is successful, is to give Russian kids experience playing in competitive hockey situations. The lack of competitive experience really showed against Finland last night. Yes, the Russian team had more talented individuals than Finland (Kuznetsov, Tarasenko, Kitsyn), but the Finnish team looked like they knew what they wanted to do and did a better job of attacking and bottling the Russians up in their own zone. In my opinion, the lack of competitive experience is what makes the Russian defensemen look so lost and confused as to what to do at times.