It might be a bit unconventional, but my view is that we think way too much about offense when considering the role of centers. The reality is that two dynamic offensive wingers can drive a line offensively even if they don't have a top offensive C. The role of the C is to make sure that the line doesn't spend too much time in their own zone and can push the play into the offensive zone where the wingers can go to work. That's why I think the Jets might consider focusing on winger talent and not sell the store for an offensive C like Duchene.
The Jets have two elite defensive centers in Lowry and Copp. Pair either of them with two highly talented wingers and I think offense will be created, assuming that they can tilt the ice in the other direction. Right now, Laine (and Roslovic) are a heavy lift in their own zone and without more offensive zone time they just aren't going to produce any offense.
Consider options at the TDL. Hayes and Duchene are offensively productive centers that struggle defensively. Do we really want a C with Laine or Connor or Roslovic that will struggle in their own zone? I think we might have the same issue we have with Little. Would the Jets be better off with Hayes or Duchene, or should they consider using a very good defensive C like Copp paired with another good winger that can also drive some offense (like Zuccarello). Before any quick reaction about Copp's offensive deficiencies, perhaps consider that his points/60 this season is the same as Perreault and higher than Connor. His on-ice shooting % inflates that a bit, but he's not really a black hole on offense.
The charts below illustrate the performance characteristics of a few trade options, and for Copp. All things considered, should the Jets perhaps consider giving Copp a bigger role and bringing in another winger that can tilt the ice and create some offense?
Ehlers-Scheifele-Wheeler
Laine-Copp-Zuccarello
Connor-Little-Roslovic
Perreault-Lowry-Tanev
View attachment 181323
View attachment 181325
View attachment 181327