Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Is Our Roster Really Set Already Once McLeod Signs?

Is Our Roster Set With McLeod?

  • Yes, No More Cap = No More Moves

    Votes: 27 20.0%
  • No, There Will Be 1 Trade or Signing

    Votes: 71 52.6%
  • No, There Will Be 2 or More Trades or Signings

    Votes: 34 25.2%
  • No, Some Roster Players Will Be Waived

    Votes: 3 2.2%

  • Total voters
    135
Status
Not open for further replies.

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
17,918
13,440
Edmonton
I don't trade Broberg, XB, Holloway or Schaefer for a single year of an aging Kane. No way.

Don't get me wrong, it would be great to have him, but he's essentially a rental. We are trading a career of Puljujarvi, a 1st, a 2nd and a decent prospect already... for one year... that's already a pretty stellar return.

I'm personally against trading Puljujarvi right now. I'd play him for another 40 games in Oilers silks and then trade him mid-season for a decent return... see pouting Drouin for Sergachev. I know it sounds crazy, but Puljujarvi has some game in him and if he can recreate his elite defensive/outscoring numbers for another 30 games, there will be PLENTY of suitors at fair value.

There is no need to rush. We don't need Kane for the first 30 games of the season, and Chicago doesn't need to trade him now either.
I wouldn't trade Broberg or XB but i'd trade Schaefer easily. He's essentially a 2nd round pick that might never make an impact in the NHL. I'd rather get Kane at the deadline as well since the cost should be cheaper and the cap will be easier to fit as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarksideGhost

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,398
4,611
If JP could have the start he had last year his value at the trade deadline would be very high. At that point I would have to consider moving him in a hockey trade simply because it would also mean he'd price himself out for next year.

Agree and I'm also reluctantly down with trading a disgruntled player, but like you say, it's got to be on our terms.
 

dssource

5-14-6-1=97
Jun 29, 2012
4,964
7,093
lots of closet flames fans in here. Pathetic lol

The team downgraded and got older. This is great news
Bolded are my thoughts exactly. Desperation moves by their GM to attempt to stay relevant. Paying top dollar to 2 guys who had career years right before contract negotiations. And the team is still worse than the one we eliminated. Highly doubt Kadri gets 30 goals or over 60pts again.
 

belair

Jay Woodcroft Unemployment Stance
Apr 9, 2010
38,641
21,839
Canada
As good as Bedard is, people fall in love with prospects too much. No GM is going to pick a prospect over a 115 player, 85 point player and top pairing Dman that just fell into their lap.

Also a full rebuild can stunt Bedard's development
The player that just 'fell into their lap' is going to be 30 when that contract begins. The 115 point version of that player is a mirage.

The reason it's smart to draft and develop is primarily payscale. When you're paying UFA prices for the production of a player who came from somewhere else, you're probably getting bad value throughout the term of that deal.

I'm not even going to try and address the stunting of development. That's just silly. But teams draft high-end prospects because they get seven or eight years of team control of these players when they're at the pinnacle of their value.

Rebuilds don't have to be long-term. They don't need to be complete teardowns. Gaining draft capital in one or two years where your team needs to reload after losing two offensive catalysts would've been the responsible, logical play.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: oilers'72

Canovin

1% is the new 11.5%
Oct 27, 2010
17,489
8,269
780
The player that just 'fell into their lap' is going to be 30 when that contract begins. The 115 point version of that player is mirage.

The reason it's smart to draft and develop is primarily payscale. When you're paying UFA prices for the production of a player who came from somewhere else, you're probably getting bad value throughout the term of that deal.

I'm not even going to try and address the stunting of development. That's just silly. But teams draft high-end prospects because they get seven or eight years of team control of these players when they're at the pinnacle of their value.

Rebuilds don't have to be long-term. They don't need to be complete teardowns. Gaining draft capital in one or two years where your team needs to reload after losing two offensive catalysts would've been the responsible, logical play.
The draft and develop only works if your team can draft and develop. For a team like Calgary, they're terrible at it. I doubt the organization wants a rebuild because of many reason and one of that reason is a total rebuild is usually the last thing teams want from a financial point of view and drafting and developing are not guaranteed. Look at the Oilers, we essentially failed 2 rebuilds(Gagner era and Hall era) and still trying to figure our rebuild #3(McDavid era). Our entire rebuild has been like 15 years.
 

CantHaveTkachev

Legends
Nov 30, 2004
50,017
30,153
St. OILbert, AB
I don't think Calgary needs to match Gaudreau and Tkachuk career seasons for them to be a better team overall.
The Oilers did better as a team overall with McDavid and Nurse putting less PPG than they did in the Canadian division.

Stacking the 1st line vs having a more balanced team
because they had insane health luck

their top 4 d-men missed 10 games COMBINED...with Kylington missing 9 and Hanifin missing 1 whole game all year

their top 8 scorers missed missed a grand total of 2 games COMBINED

imagine the continuity
 

Canovin

1% is the new 11.5%
Oct 27, 2010
17,489
8,269
780
because they had insane health luck

their top 4 d-men missed 10 games COMBINED...with Kylington missing 9 and Hanifin missing 1 whole game all year

their top 8 scorers missed missed a grand total of 2 games COMBINED

imagine the continuity
Yes and they also stacked up the 1st line which is the point I'm getting at. I'm sure they're more balanced if Tkachuk or Gaudreau plays on the 2nd line to elevate the 2nd line.
 

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
25,651
20,008
Waterloo Ontario
I don't think Calgary needs to match Gaudreau and Tkachuk career seasons for them to be a better team overall.
The Oilers did better as a team overall with McDavid and Nurse putting less PPG than they did in the Canadian division.

Stacking the 1st line vs having a more balanced team
Someone has to score goals. They could easily be down 30+ in GF and I doubt they lower their GA. That decreases their goal differential by 30+.

Last year the regular season was a perfect storm of good luck for the Flames. They went the whole year without any significant injuries outside of Tanev. And they had insane levels of production form players who never came close to that before. Even if they are more balanced, it will be extremely hard for them to come close to last year's success.

They were completely exposed in the playoffs defensively.
 

GOilers88

#DustersWinCups
Dec 24, 2016
14,412
21,228
Much as I like Patrick Kane I can’t for the life of me understand why so many people want this to happen instead of trying to shore up the defender, which seems like a far, far bigger need than another top six scorer.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
99,867
13,849
Somewhere on Uranus
with the JG contract with the flames the fact there is 61.5 in signing bonuses that crack me up


Jonathan Huberdeau signed a 8 year, $84,000,000 contract with the Calgary Flames on Aug. 4, 2022. The contract has a cap hit of $10,500,000.
SEASONCLAUSECAP HIT
Tooltip
AAV
Tooltip
P. BONUSES
Tooltip
S. BONUSES
Tooltip
BASE SALARY
Tooltip
TOTAL SALARY
Tooltip
MINORS SAL
Tooltip
2023-24NMC$10,500,000$10,500,000$0$7,000,000$3,500,000$10,500,000$10,500,000
2024-25NMC$10,500,000$10,500,000$0$7,000,000$3,500,000$10,500,000$10,500,000
2025-26NMC$10,500,000$10,500,000$0$7,000,000$3,500,000$10,500,000$10,500,000
2026-27NMC$10,500,000$10,500,000$0$9,500,000$1,000,000$10,500,000$10,500,000
2027-28NMC$10,500,000$10,500,000$0$9,500,000$1,000,000$10,500,000$10,500,000
2028-29NMC$10,500,000$10,500,000$0$7,000,000$3,500,000$10,500,000$10,500,000
2029-30M-NTC, NMC$10,500,000$10,500,000$0$9,500,000$1,000,000$10,500,000$10,500,000
2030-31M-NTC, NMC$10,500,000$10,500,000$0$5,000,000$5,500,000$10,500,000$10,500,000
TOTAL$84,000,000$84,000,000$0$61,500,000$22,500,000$84,000,000$84,000,000
 

Seachd

Registered User
Mar 16, 2002
24,939
8,947
I’d much rather have Tkachuk than Kadri, and that’s barely even considering the ridiculous age difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDNicks17

Raab

Registered User
Oct 6, 2007
18,085
2,777
Much as I like Patrick Kane I can’t for the life of me understand why so many people want this to happen instead of trying to shore up the defender, which seems like a far, far bigger need than another top six scorer.
No good defenders available is the problem. Ryan Graves is probably the best, but I think having a 3rd line that can dominate the competition would help us win more games.
 

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
25,651
20,008
Waterloo Ontario
Much as I like Patrick Kane I can’t for the life of me understand why so many people want this to happen instead of trying to shore up the defender, which seems like a far, far bigger need than another top six scorer.
Shoring up the defense probably has to come internally in the short run and possibly after the cap opens up from outside.

There is no defender even conceivably available at a price that would make sense that could have the impact of adding Kane might have.

Colorado did not win this year because their defense was rock solid at keeping the puck out of their net. They won because their offense overwhelmed the opposition with Makar a huge part of that attack. Kane would be a a massive addition for a possible cup run.

The Oilers could stack the top two lines or run

Kane McDaivd XXX
Hyman Draisaitl YYY
Kane Nuge ZZZ

or your favourite combination of pairs and be an absolute nightmare to match up with.
 
Last edited:

Beerfish

Registered User
Apr 14, 2007
19,513
5,665
I’d much rather have Tkachuk than Kadri, and that’s barely even considering the ridiculous age difference.
The issue is it is not a one for one trade off.

The salary difference, and the trade assets make it much closer than a one for one comparison.
 

Oilhawks

Oden's Ride Over Nordland
Nov 24, 2011
26,421
45,706
Bolded are my thoughts exactly. Desperation moves by their GM to attempt to stay relevant. Paying top dollar to 2 guys who had career years right before contract negotiations. And the team is still worse than the one we eliminated. Highly doubt Kadri gets 30 goals or over 60pts again.

Even with the Flames having an absolute storybook level of luck last season aside (almost no injuries, career high points across the board), I look at it like this

Gaudreau > Huberdeau

Tkachuk >> Kadri (might be even more with Tkachuk entering his prime and Kadri exiting his)

Weegar > Gudbranson

They downgraded on forward talent and upgraded a bit on D. They are a playoff team but the only way they take the division league is another (even more so?) storybook season and everyone else in the top of the Pacific underachieving
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tarus and dssource
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad