ChaoticOrange
Registered User
In no world is Yakupov worth a 1st. He'd be lucky to fetch a 4th.
You understand that we just got a 3rd for possibly the worst defenceman at defence in the entire NHL?
In no world is Yakupov worth a 1st. He'd be lucky to fetch a 4th.
In no world is Yakupov worth a 1st. He'd be lucky to fetch a 4th.
In no world is Yakupov worth a 1st. He'd be lucky to fetch a 4th.
Is Spec wrong here though?
Is Spec wrong here though?
In no world is Yakupov worth a 1st. He'd be lucky to fetch a 4th.
I don't know if its worth trading Yak for picks. I wonder though if we can trade him in a similar deal that saw us get Perron. Paajarvi was worse offensively than Yak so I think Yak would have a BIT more value (I stress a bit).
Yaks current value is a third at best I would put money on that.
Purcell is clearly better.
Hudler only got a second and fourth and has a solid track record.
Maybe you could get a late second for Yak from someone that doesn't watch him often or only seen him good.
In the summer his value could go up especially if he remembers how to score between now and then.
Are you referring to Krueger when you talk about clowns? Krueger blamed Whitney for everything and gave other defensemen a free ride when they made mistakes.Lots of people bad mouth the Oilers.
They are the joke of the league in case you haven't noticed.
Whitney has as much reason as anyone else given that he actually wore the jersey and had to deal with clowns in the organization on a personal level.
I think we need to bring back ConYak.
Yaks current value is a third at best I would put money on that.
Purcell is clearly better.
Hudler only got a second and fourth and has a solid track record.
Maybe you could get a late second for Yak from someone that doesn't watch him often or only seen him good.
In the summer his value could go up especially if he remembers how to score between now and then.
Remember that Brett Connolly was able to land two 2nd round picks.
I don't think it's entirely unrealistic that a playoff team with a higher pick would deal it for Yakupov.
He's on a cheap deal right now, too.
That being said, I think I'm ready to move on from Yak now. I'd gladly take a 1st for him. I know some people will shake their heads at this never ending cycling of trading players for picks but Yak is not gonna work here. And that 1st can be a valuable trade chip/deal sweetener for a very very good D man down the road.
I have no clue, I would think Yak still has a roster player in value? Gotta think so?
With all the talk going on with Yak, its fair to say hes a goner though weather we like it or not?
Yaks current value is a third at best I would put money on that.
Purcell is clearly better.
Hudler only got a second and fourth and has a solid track record.
Maybe you could get a late second for Yak from someone that doesn't watch him often or only seen him good.
In the summer his value could go up especially if he remembers how to score between now and then.
Statement loses credibility when bias shines through.I don't get how popping a few gravy goals with McD launches Eberle into this 'can't move him' tier in some people's minds. We're averaging like 1.5 goals a game during this streak. Eberle and McDavid are not inseparably tied.
No. I'm referring to Katz, Lowe, MacT, Howson etc etc.Are you referring to Krueger when you talk about clowns? Krueger blamed Whitney for everything and gave other defensemen a free ride when they made mistakes.
Dam Spec doesnt think Yak is worth much at all.
I really actually hope he is wrong
Well it's not like he's ever proven himself to know anything, so we might be safe there.