jetsforever
Registered User
- Dec 14, 2013
- 27,430
- 23,538
Is Columbus blowing it up or does he just really want out?
why was this removed
Bob + Panarin
for
Quick + Martinez + Pearson
how is this trolling? lol
Who is the last goalie that got a 1st? Was it miller to St. Louis? I don’t remember.....but I also don’t remember goalies being traded for much beside Schneider.
San Jose paid a first + prospect for Martin Jones
Leafs paid a first (30th overall - Pens) + 2nd for Andersen
Calgary paid early 2nd (35th overall) for Elliot
I think all those were 2016?
Colorado paid a first + for Varlamov back in the day.
I'm sure there have been others in between. You would think there would be a website that tracks trade by position or at least has a list of all goalie trades, but I couldn't find one.
Neither actually.
It’s been rumored bob wants to be the highest paid goalie in the league and wants a long contract.
Columbus is not in a position to pay him 10 million a year.
His contract expires at seasons end and has a quality backup who is currently 3-0 and played well last year. Add on a very strong prospect in Merlinkis and it’s the perfect storm of “move him before he leaves”
all true but the Isles paid a 4th for halak
the kings traded a 4th for Bishop
and most importantly they were both pending unrestricted free agents like Bobrovsky. all the players you named had term on their deals
so its not exactly relevant especially when The Bob is asking 9-10M for 6-8 years
all true but the Isles paid a 4th for halak
the kings traded a 4th for Bishop
and most importantly they were both pending unrestricted free agents like Bobrovsky. all the players you named had term on their deals
so its not exactly relevant especially when The Bob is asking 9-10M for 6-8 years.... you cant name another example of a goalie asking that and being traded. its never happened
its the contract and tern that make this unique. you cant just pretend they dont exist
bull, bishop and halak were both rentals, as is the bob, twist the facts all you like, he's still a rentalHalak and Bishop were both backups.
You're also totally misremembering the Bishop trade. He was actually originally traded with a 5th rounder for Budaj (who was incredibly hot), Cernak (a 2015 2nd rounder who looks like a great find for Tampa and almost broke camp), and two 7ths.
The 4th round pick came in May, when he would become a Unrestricted Free Agent in July and had no intention of signing on a team that had Jonathan Quick.
ok point taken.All he asked was who was the last goalie that got a first, so I answered with some recent examples, not taking contract status or anything into account.
bull, bishop and halak were both rentals, as is the bob, twist the facts all you like, he's still a rental
ok point taken.
but they bear no resemblance to this situation because of the contract factors
they still were starters after the rental season with the Islanders and Stars, they were only backups because their teams couldnt trade them otherwiseThere are no fact twists.
Bishop and Halak were not starters at the time of their deals. I don't know how you can argue that.
perfectly fine take.Obviously each situation is different but it's good to be able to kind of see what various types of goalies have gotten in the past. I believe Elliot had 1 year left on his deal until UFA and he got 35th. Bob currently has 90% of his deal until UFA. The main factor will be the NMC and how many teams he limits trades to. His value could be worse than an early 2nd as far as interested teams are concerned, but it would have to be a worthwhile offer in order for Columbus to trade him at this point in the season.
The Blues are tight against the cap. If there's a deal to be done there, Allen almost certainly has to be involved, plus someone else like Gunnarsson just to make the dollars work (unless Columbus retains ~$3 million to leave him out). That's just to make a deal possible at all, not for "value." If that doesn't work for Columbus, then the Blues simply aren't a viable partner.So, useless, not useful, not useful, and future.
Y'all do realize that players are not fungible assets, right? There's no universal "two top line left wingers equal a top-pairing RHD" chart out there because it's not possible.
Is Columbus blowing it up or does he just really want out?
Given that the package being offered amounts to nothing useful for the Jackets, you are therefore basically suggesting that we should trade him for nothing useful early instead of losing him for nothing useful later.And other teams shouldn’t help others unload talent they will lose at the end of the season for nothing.
Hold it. Hold it right there. We haven't tried "pushing him" ANYWHERE. Not getting responses you want to hear does not constitute a sales pitch.its not, Id say its actually a fair deal too its alot better than columbus fans trying to push him to teams like the Islanders and St Louis who have repeatedly said they're not a fit
I can understand the salary situation, but if we're not getting something we can actually use and get value from, then there's no point in trading him. That package does not constitute anything we can actually get value from - except maybe the pick that we might get something from years from now.The Blues are tight against the cap. If there's a deal to be done there, Allen almost certainly has to be involved, plus someone else like Gunnarsson just to make the dollars work (unless Columbus retains ~$3 million to leave him out). That's just to make a deal possible at all, not for "value." If that doesn't work for Columbus, then the Blues simply aren't a viable partner.
Given that the package being offered amounts to nothing useful for the Jackets, you are therefore basically suggesting that we should trade him for nothing useful early instead of losing him for nothing useful later.
* * *
Hold it. Hold it right there. We haven't tried "pushing him" ANYWHERE. Not getting responses you want to hear does not constitute a sales pitch.
* * *
I can understand the salary situation, but if we're not getting something we can actually use and get value from, then there's no point in trading him. That package does not constitute anything we can actually get value from - except maybe the pick that we might get something from years from now.
Given that the package being offered amounts to nothing useful for the Jackets, you are therefore basically suggesting that we should trade him for nothing useful early instead of losing him for nothing useful later.
* * *
Hold it. Hold it right there. We haven't tried "pushing him" ANYWHERE. Not getting responses you want to hear does not constitute a sales pitch.
* * *
I can understand the salary situation, but if we're not getting something we can actually use and get value from, then there's no point in trading him. That package does not constitute anything we can actually get value from - except maybe the pick that we might get something from years from now.