How exactly was Roy better? Marty ended his career with a higher sv% even though thats the one thing Brodeur haters use to harp on him. He had more Vezina's and owns the SO and Wins record. He used smaller pads and was a much better puck handler? Better SV% plus better ability on the puck. How exactly was Roy better??
Marty is the greatest all around goaltender of all time, he could do it all.
Roy is arguably the Greatest of all-time because of his playoff record.
Brodeur despite playing more seasons than Roy doesn't come even remotely close to Roy's PO resume.
Roy has PO records that are Gretzkyesk for the level they're on.
Roy has 4 Cups
Roy is the ONLY player with 3 Conn Smythe's
Brodeur is 2nd all-time in PO wins, a whopping 21 wins up on 3rd place Fuhr. Unfortunately Roy is a staggering total of 38 wins up on Brodeur.
And one can talk all they want about how that's because Roy played 42 more PO games than Brodeur did but it means that even if Brodeur did play another 42 PO games, he would have to go 38-4 in them just to tie Roy...sorry.
Roy's PO overtime record is just plain ridiculous at 40-16. No one is even remotely close to that. Hell, Roy's silly 24-6 PO OT record just with the Habs is still the most in NHL history heh (Belfour is #2 with a 20-22 PO OT record)
Lastly...
Roy played in 43 PO series over his career.
His record is 32-11.
Out of those 11 series losses, only 5 of them were in less than 7 games, only 3 of them were in less than 6.
If you were facing Roy in the playoffs, these were your odds...
You only had a 26% chance of winning in general
You only had a 12% chance of winning in less than 7 games
You only had a 7% chance of winning in 5 games or less
If you went to OT vs Roy in general, you only had a 29% of winning that game.
If you went to OT vs Roy as a Montreal Canadien, you only had a 20% of winning that game.
THAT my friend is complete and utter domination of a level that Brodeur doesn't even come remotely close to being on!
NO ONE DOES!!!
Sorry