delled
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2009
- 803
- 16
How would they fair? Doesn't make sense to ask about Hasek. He's inappropiate for any era.
don't know much at all about Hasek. why is he inappropriate
both would probably be top 10 in the league especially if the league slims down goalie equipment as planned next season
I'm sorry probably?
They'd be the best goalies in the league. 1 and 2...like they were throughout their careers. Neither goalie's game was down to size of equipment. Broduer even had smaller ones than he could've used.
I don't think so unless you're talking about in their very prime years
What are you basing this on? Your Equipment size point was ridiculous.
Border just retired...he didn't look out of place until his later years. I fail to see how they're not better than Lundqvist, Price etc.
you take any of Brodeur's last 6 seasons (30% of his career) over current Price or prime Lundqvist?
Brodeur is basically Luongo except Brodeur was on the better team, his 03 and 04 Vezinas are questionable at best.
Roy was just way better, there's no comparison.
This is close enough that I will give it to the superior puck handler. Brodeur is probably the best puck mover of all time when it comes to goalies. This is such a weapon.
This is close enough that I will give it to the superior puck handler. Brodeur is probably the best puck mover of all time when it comes to goalies. This is such a weapon.
Then you have Hasek who was on another planet entirely. How he didn't win several cups with the Sabres still boggles the mind.
How would they fair? Doesn't make sense to ask about Hasek. He's inappropiate for any era.
Neither would be very good at all. Brodeur retired a couple years ago and was not that very good at the end. Brodeur is now 44 and Roy is 51. Goalies just can't play at that age in today's league.