AustonsNostrils
Registered User
- Apr 5, 2016
- 7,409
- 2,534
Harrington says Guhle couldn't be called up even if they wanted to without his ELC kicking in. What's the rule?
How did Falk and Fedun jump in front of Nelson on the depth chart? Do we have another Ruhwedel on our hands?
Harrington says Guhle couldn't be called up even if they wanted to without his ELC kicking in. What's the rule?
How did Falk and Fedun jump in front of Nelson on the depth chart? Do we have another Ruhwedel on our hands?
His ELC will slide unless he plays 10 or more NHL games. This idea that ELCs "kick in" creates a false perception of how they work, imo. The slide rule does not delay when an ELC starts, an ELC starts as soon as it is signed (or as soon as the following July 1, in some cases), the slide rule actually extends already active NHL SPCs.
This was my biggest issue with Murray's offseason: not addressing D-men depth. And he still could have made a waiver claim on McIlrath but passed, even when it was obvious we needed to send Nelson down. And now it's biting us in the ass.
This was my biggest issue with Murray's offseason: not addressing D-men depth. And he still could have made a waiver claim on McIlrath but passed, even when it was obvious we needed to send Nelson down. And now it's biting us in the ass.
While true, Fedun and Falk have both been pretty good, which nobody expected. I don't know if you can really plan for being down 3 top 4 defensemen.
So if we wanted to in an emergency call him up and played him in less than 10 games there's no burning a year of his ELC.
A more recent example would be Nazem Kadri on Feb 8, 2010, as opposed to Schenn on Nov 26, 2009.
Even more recent are Sven Baertschi (5 games in March 2012) and Ryan Murphy (4 games in Feb 2013).
While true, Fedun and Falk have both been pretty good, which nobody expected. I don't know if you can really plan for being down 3 top 4 defensemen.
What????
He added Falk and Fedun... both veterans, who are playing quite well after coming up from Rochester as depth defensemen.
How can you complain about not adding D depth, and propose a busted draft pick/waiver wire player as a solution.
Murray did a very good job adding depth. The issue was he wasn't able to upgrade the top 4.
Yeah, ish. The trouble starts when Gorges is a top 4 defenseman.
He traded a bottom pairing defenseman for a top-4 D. He signed two bottom pairing defenseman for nothing who have already shown to be more reliable than any bottom pair than we've had in years (Weber, Cola, Franson, *shiver*) as well as signed another top college UFA to see if he can hack it.
Best you can blame him for is trading away McNabb, and I'm pretty sure we'd be ragging on McNabb pretty hard if he was playing for us.
Hard to blame a GM for not preparing for 3 of his top-4 to go out and one of his bottom 2 to go as well.
Well, guess that shows me.
What does this mean, how long can he stay?