Paxon
202* Stanley Cup Champions
For the record I'm cool with offersheets, I just think it's a rare case where you find one where the compensation makes sense for both the team and player while being too much for the original team to match.
For the record I'm cool with offersheets, I just think it's a rare case where you find one where the compensation makes sense for both the team and player while being too much for the original team to match.
Yeah I really doubt it happens but it each year fewer and fewer players like the ones Murray wants to add are available.It's an interesting concept given our plethora of usable assets. It's just not a common route, almost an unspoken thing, and I don't anticipate that changing much all of a sudden.
Yeah I really doubt it happens but it each year fewer and fewer players like the ones Murray wants to add are available.
I still maintain that if it wasn't 2015 this year RyJo would have easily been offersheeted.
I wonder if Blues could match $6,5M - $7,5M for Tarasenko? That kid is a superstar in the making.
The only reason they would possibly decline is the perception that were handing them Austin Matthews.I wonder if Blues could match $6,5M - $7,5M for Tarasenko? That kid is a superstar in the making.
Tarasenko is the one I'd consider. The others aren't talented enough for me to risk the high pick.
I dont understand your point with the trades?
RFA Offersheet should be a legitimate tool for a team in our shoes:
- We are flush with prospect talent and 2015 pick (any offersheet would be for 2016 picks and beyond).
- We have plenty of cap space
- We are going to have a very young core, getting some talent that is a little further ahead is ideal
- With an offersheet you can target a very specific player, the type of player that rarely ends up on the trade/free agent market.
there is no reason to operate out of fear.
Its not fear its respect.
so we should bypass opportunities to make our team better and reach our goals out of respect for our opponent?
That's just silly....
I still think it's ridiculous and far-fetched.
An executive needs to manage based on a level-headed and rational assessment of the needs of his organization. Allowing petty grievances and grudges to influence how you manage a multi-million dollar enterprise likely means you are not a very good executive.
I'm not really worried about it just passing on that its happened. Oddly you still seem in denial that it does.
My personal stance is I think offer sheets are a terrible way to acquire players from an assets management pov.
I've always thought this unwritten "no offer sheets" rule is total bullsh*t. It would make the league much more exciting from year-to-year; it would ensure that GMs are paying guys what they're worth on the market, and helps struggling teams recover faster. It rewards good cap management, which should be rewarded.
Not even just for the sake of the Sabres....who the hell wants to see a team be a perennial punching bag? I'd love for the Oilers to offersheet ROR and/or some other big names, for instance.
Generally I would agree with you, but if you can pick up a guy that you are certain is an impact player, is that really a bad asset move vs hoping that some of your picks hit?
Say its Tyler Toffoli for 6.5 a year. You have to give up a 1st, a 2nd and a 3rd.
Is it really likely that you are going to pick up a better player than Toffoli with any of those picks? Given the view that some people have that the Sabres will be a bottom 5 team again next year its possible the first player will become Toffoli, but not guaranteed. Its unlikely that the 2nd or the 3rd make the NHL at all let alone becomes impact players. Meanwhile at this point Toffoli is pretty proven as an effective NHL player. He has had success in the Playoffs and regular season. He's 22. Seems like a fair trade off to me.
Generally I would agree with you, but if you can pick up a guy that you are certain is an impact player, is that really a bad asset move vs hoping that some of your picks hit?
Say its Tyler Toffoli for 6.5 a year. You have to give up a 1st, a 2nd and a 3rd.
Is it really likely that you are going to pick up a better player than Toffoli with any of those picks? Given the view that some people have that the Sabres will be a bottom 5 team again next year its possible the first player will become Toffoli, but not guaranteed. Its unlikely that the 2nd or the 3rd make the NHL at all let alone becomes impact players. Meanwhile at this point Toffoli is pretty proven as an effective NHL player. He has had success in the Playoffs and regular season. He's 22. Seems like a fair trade off to me.
Incredible isn't.
Very nuanced points fellas