But success also takes time and often doesn't reflect the plan we start with in our head nearly as much as we'd like to believe.
The danger in times of uncertainty is that we tend to retreat into ourselves --- our fears, our own sense of control. We become married to ideas and concepts that inevitably are going to need to evolve and change.
I think that's probably going to be one of our biggest challenges on these boards. We tend to hunker down when we're rattled.
It's a rebuild, why not look at it logically?
A rebuilding team is better playing Staal until they eventually scratch him or play him right up until the point they buy him out or are they better using that ice time somehow else?
Players on the last years of the entry level, better to find out if they can play at the NHL level or not?
Players who have years left on their entry level, better to force them into the NHL roster and limit their minutes, or let them play bigger minutes in all situations in the AHL?
Players they'd like to sell, better to put the importance on their possible value on the back burner or to try to put them into position to be able to get more value back out of them?
They are the ones married to contradictory concepts, Lias, it's good for him to develop and play in the AHL, Chytil though it's okay for him to get 10 minutes of ice time in the NHL. Pionk has to be developed, but ADA we can scratch him for the two first games. Fast, Physical, Relentless are adjectives that describe Staal? I could probably list more but point I am making is they seem all disheveled, yes it's been only 3 games, but they created more of that than they needed to.