Speculation: Roster Building Thread LIX: To trade or not to trade CK?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lion Hound

@JoeTucc26
Mar 12, 2007
8,239
3,612
Montauk NY
I think these are reasonable goal expectations:

Panarin 25
Zib 25
Buchnevich 20
Kakko 20
Kravtsov 15
Chytil 15
Andersson 10
Namestnikov 10
Strome 10
Fast 10
Lemieux 10
Howden 10
Trouba 5
DeAngelo 5
Shattenkirk 5
Fox 5
Skjei 5
Nieves 5
Hajek 2
Rykov 2
Staal 2

My realistic predictions on the season. That equates to 216 goals. Not enough, even with good goaltending. We need some big time breakouts to make the playoffs.

If Kreider stays, we’re close, but that’s not the right long term decision.

25 Goals for an 11.6 million dollar cap hit? I don't think Panarin should get a pass on expectations. 30-35 Goals minimum should be the number.
 

MetalJaws

Registered User
Mar 12, 2014
891
671
Strome strikes me as the type of guy who has bounced around a bit and would b just fine taking a 3-4 year deal for ~$3-3.5m per season with some sort of trade protection. I think he likes it with the Rangers and is a nice utility type of player I'd be okay re-signing. His versatility is a positive and he is a RFA at years end so they will have the opportunity to negotiate exclusively.

I'd be all for that as a depth RW guy as well.
 

I Eat Crow

Fear The Mullet
Jul 9, 2007
19,651
12,756
If the Rangers keep Kreider I say we make the playoffs.
I think the Rangers can make it with or without Kreider.

I think a lot of us underestimate how much of an improvement we'll see on defense with Trouba coming on board and Pionk going out. Pionk is addition by subtraction. That move alone and having Hajek or Rykov on LD instead of Smith is going to make a big difference.
 

JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
79,351
16,807
I think the Rangers can make it with or without Kreider.

I think a lot of us underestimate how much of an improvement we'll see on defense with Trouba coming on board and Pionk going out. Pionk is addition by subtraction. That move alone and having Hajek or Rykov on LD instead of Smith is going to make a big difference.
Ya I think Howden and Chytil will take slight steps forward as well. I think they each can put up ~40 points next season, give or take.
 

QJL

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
6,235
4,538
25 Goals for an 11.6 million dollar cap hit? I don't think Panarin should get a pass on expectations. 30-35 Goals minimum should be the number.

He has averaged 29 in his career with a better supporting cast. I’m expecting the player we have seen since he entered the league. The player we paid for. I have expectations and I have predictions. I think Panarin finishes around 30 goals, 80 points.
 

Avery16

Shake my hand, fatso
Jun 28, 2015
12,908
8,666
Brooklyn
Toronto signed their big contract in Tavares the year they had to pay Nylander and the year before they had to pay Matthews and Marner.

The Rangers signed Panarin three years before those guys are up for new contracts. And Zibanejad is signed for three years as well. We have massive hits like Hank, Smith, Staal, and Shattenkirk coming off the books before we have to sign any of Mika. Kakko, Kravtsov, Chytil, Fox, etc.

If the team is any good, of course there’ll be a cap crunch, but Gorton has basically set himself up for three years of a healthy cap.
And yet we’re still trying to find a way to get Trouba and Buch signed and not get shortchanged in trading Kreider, Names and Fast.
 

Tawnos

A guy with a bass
Sep 10, 2004
29,080
10,818
Charlotte, NC
I think the Rangers can make it with or without Kreider.

I think a lot of us underestimate how much of an improvement we'll see on defense with Trouba coming on board and Pionk going out. Pionk is addition by subtraction. That move alone and having Hajek or Rykov on LD instead of Smith is going to make a big difference.

I don't think we should necessarily expect Hajek or Rykov to be an immediate improvement. They're both going to have rookie struggles. Smith doesn't have those, but is not very good... so I think that will wash out in the end. Also, Staal might decline further. Shattenkirk might decline further. Until those guys are gone and their replacements get some experience, I wouldn't bank on major improvements on D.
 

GordonGecko

First Ping Pong Ball
Oct 28, 2010
9,049
1,030
New York City
The simple truth is that every really good team has cap issues. Some more pressing than others. Every team has to move out players to stay cap compliant.

That’s not a bad thing. It means you have a really good team.

But the best way to avoid a long term issue is have a pipeline of young players ready to step in. One of the reasons I am bullish on the Rangers future is that they are stocked with prospects, many of whom are in college or Europe with longer fuses.
ppoYDFu.jpg
 

Cag29

94! I’m ready for more! LGR!
Jul 18, 2018
1,226
1,035
The simple truth is that every really good team has cap issues. Some more pressing than others. Every team has to move out players to stay cap compliant.

That’s not a bad thing. It means you have a really good team.

But the best way to avoid a long term issue is have a pipeline of young players ready to step in. One of the reasons I am bullish on the Rangers future is that they are stocked with prospects, many of whom are in college or Europe with longer fuses.
 

Mikos87

Registered User
Mar 19, 2002
9,064
3,244
Visit site
Strome strikes me as the type of guy who has bounced around a bit and would b just fine taking a 3-4 year deal for ~$3-3.5m per season with some sort of trade protection. I think he likes it with the Rangers and is a nice utility type of player I'd be okay re-signing. His versatility is a positive and he is a RFA at years end so they will have the opportunity to negotiate exclusively.

I think you're right and that's a valuable commodity. He's a great utility guy, I was clamoring for a player of Strome's profile for two years. He's not a proven playoff performer, but all things considered, having a 20-20 third liner that can kill penalties would be great. I hope he gets a little better on the PK though.
 

Kovalev27

BEST IN THE WORLD
Jun 22, 2004
21,479
25,772
NYC
I think the Rangers can make it with or without Kreider.

I think a lot of us underestimate how much of an improvement we'll see on defense with Trouba coming on board and Pionk going out. Pionk is addition by subtraction. That move alone and having Hajek or Rykov on LD instead of Smith is going to make a big difference.

I’m not underestimating the improvement at all that’s why I’m putting them in the playoffs. Replacing Pionk with Trouba alone will do it. But that’s with Kreider in the lineup. Without him think we fall short.
 

DutchShamrock

Registered User
Nov 22, 2005
8,104
3,060
New Jersey
There is a HUGE difference between Toronto and the Rangers. Toronto barely sold off anyone in their years of ineptitude. Yes, they had high picks who have developed into leaders in their forward group but they are missing the secondary pieces later in the 1st round the Rangers have snagged over the last few years. Nash, McDonagh, Hayes, Zuccarello, Brassard, Stepan, soon to be Kreider. These trades were done at a time when those players still had significant value and allowed Gorton the ability to add those secondary pieces a team like Toronto is missing. It's one of the reasons Gorton is looking like such a genius, he didn't wait too long to make a course correcting decision and he has been able to build depth throughout the system at nearly every position.
I don't know. They had Bozak, Kadri, JVR, and Gardner as some pretty decent depth pieces. Some tough players that score ugly goals, do dirty work. They lost that depth because of Marleau and Tavares.

Toronto stripped it down decently. Sure it could have been better, and Lupul and Horton didn't help. We have dead cap too. Girardi this year, whoever gets bought out for probably 4 more years. Who ever doesnt get bought out for 2 more years. It's a better situation here, but not to the extent we can just shrug it off.

I don't know, maybe I'm pessimistic. Cap flexibility would have been nice to lock up Trouba long term, then ADA and Buchnevich long term at a future steal. Now we have to eat up future cap with buyouts, forego a bargain signing for bridge deals. Do we go to arbitration with trouba and then eat a mega signing next summer?

We project huge cap space down the line but $11.6 is going to a winger, a chance that our $7.5 #1 d will turn out to be $8+ next summer, Buch and ADA at 6 x $4.5 are $6.5 per in 2 summers, Kakko and Kravtsov are $8+ coming off ELC. Then the other dozen players we have to sign, but we are projecting 2019 dollars because they will be ignorant to the new TV and won't know about inflation.

I guess I'm not buying into the idea that if we have cap problems later on, it means our players are awesome. It sounds like a bannable offense meme from the Oilers board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Avery16

mas0764

Registered User
Jul 16, 2005
13,938
11,402

Namestnikov has no role and no future on this team, really. He’s proven he’s about a third line player on most teams; or a guy who can be the spare part and not embarrass himself playing with superstars, but he’s not the driver.

That’s worth like a second or third round pick at best, under ideal conditions. You are actually worried that we’re not gonna capitalize on that amazing value?

Fast is the same thing.

I can see being worried about having to ship Kreider off for pennies on the dollar, as he’s actually valuable to both the team, and should be valuable to other teams. But, if losing Kreider for less than market value is the price to pay for acquiring Panarin, then doing so was still a smart move you should make ten times out of ten. I’ll give away Kreider for free before I have regret about signing Panarin. Kreider’s value is not comparable to Panarin’s.
 

Avery16

Shake my hand, fatso
Jun 28, 2015
12,908
8,666
Brooklyn
Namestnikov has no role and no future on this team, really. He’s proven he’s about a third line player on most teams; or a guy who can be the spare part and not embarrass himself playing with superstars, but he’s not the driver.

That’s worth like a second or third round pick at best, under ideal conditions. You are actually worried that we’re not gonna capitalize on that amazing value?

Fast is the same thing.

I can see being worried about having to ship Kreider off for pennies on the dollar, as he’s actually valuable to both the team, and should be valuable to other teams. But, if losing Kreider for less than market value is the price to pay for acquiring Panarin, then doing so was still a smart move you should make ten times out of ten. I’ll give away Kreider for free before I have regret about signing Panarin. Kreider’s value is not comparable to Panarin’s.
I disagree with... all of this.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
42,275
53,017
In High Altitoad
I think you're right and that's a valuable commodity. He's a great utility guy, I was clamoring for a player of Strome's profile for two years. He's not a proven playoff performer, but all things considered, having a 20-20 third liner that can kill penalties would be great. I hope he gets a little better on the PK though.

I hope he gets a lot better 5 on 5
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad