Right and Left defenseman potential NHL

[Alexandre Magny]

Right defenseman

Shea Weber
Jeff Petry
Christian Folin
Josh Brook
Noah Juulsen
Cale Fleury

Left Defenseman

Ben Chiarot
Victor Mete
Brett Kulak
Alex Romanov
Jayden Struble
Matthias Norlinder
Jordan Harris
Gianni Faibrother (?)
Jacob Leguerrier (?)
Mike Reilly

Click to read more...

 

[HabsWhiteKnightLOL]

Even with a good Romanov our left side looks shit lol

 

[Runner77]

Chiarot No Fire is so good, he didn’t make the list.

 

[Alexandre Magny]

Yes Runner just Forget.

 

[A55P2]

Even with a good Romanov our left side looks **** lol

What? Mete-Romanov-Struble-Norlinder-Harris isn't good? It's one of our strongest positional depth now.

 

[26Mats]

Even with a good Romanov our left side looks **** lol

Romanov, Mete, Struble, Harris, and Norlinder all have good potential. Kulak should be a solid 3rd pair guy.

So, we need two of Romanov, Mete, Struble, Norlinder and Harris to pan out as top 4. I'm pretty confident at least 2 will pan out.

 

[Runner77]

Yes Runner just Forget.

No worries, just a harmless quip.

 

[HabsWhiteKnightLOL]

What? Mete-Romanov-Struble-Norlinder-Harris isn't good? It's one of our strongest positional depth now.

Depth
none of them are nhl proven

1 has 0 goals in 120 games and is described as an offensive d-man
Yeah until they are NHLers they are prospects with no nhl games. Who cares about depth if none of them make it.

 

[L4br3cqu3]

Depth
none of them are nhl proven

1 has 0 goals in 120 games and is described as an offensive d-man
Yeah until they are NHLers they are prospects with no nhl games. Who cares about depth if none of them make it.

Sometimes you're a very interesting poster, other times you post nonsense like this.

 

[Just Linda]

This year:
Mete - Weber
Chiarot - Petry
Kulak - Juulsen
Folin

2 years:
Mete - Petry
Romanov - Weber
Kulak - Brook/ Juulsen

5 years
Romanov - Brook
Mete - Juulsen

 

[CHwest]

Sometimes you're a very interesting poster, other times you post nonsense like this.

How is his post nonsense? It's nothing but facts.

 

[Treb]

How is his post nonsense? It's nothing but facts.

Mete is not an offensive D.

 

[417]

Even with a good Romanov our left side looks **** lol

It's especially true when you look at the Habs through a fishbowl and don't bother looking around the league to see that most teams struggle to put together 6 quality NHL Dmen.

But I mean sure...let's continue to act like this is the worst D corps to ever play in the NHL.

 

[417]

Depth
none of them are nhl proven

1 has 0 goals in 120 games and is described as an offensive d-man
Yeah until they are NHLers they are prospects with no nhl games. Who cares about depth if none of them make it.

He's actually never been described as an offensive D-man and he's never been a big point producer, at any level.

He's small, he can skate so people automatically conflate those things to mean he's an offensive D-man.

He's never going to be a big point producer but that doesn't mean he can't be an effective player

 

[vokiel]

What? Mete-Romanov-Struble-Norlinder-Harris isn't good? It's one of our strongest positional depth now.

It looks average at best. Specially when the first you list can't score for jock in the NHL

 

[A55P2]

It looks average at best. Specially when the first you list can't score for jock in the NHL

It doesn't look average. Look back in three years and we'll see!

 

[Andrei79]

What? Mete-Romanov-Struble-Norlinder-Harris isn't good? It's one of our strongest positional depth now.

The prospect depth is good, but the NHL depth is awful.

 

[Kent Nilsson]

What? Mete-Romanov-Struble-Norlinder-Harris isn't good? It's one of our strongest positional depth now.

You can make such a list with pretty much any team. In fact we might be below average.

 

[Runner77]

Mete is not an offensive D.

He is offensive to one's sensibilities, if one values goals.

 

[vokiel]

It doesn't look average. Look back in three years and we'll see!

Sure, my preliminary evaluation is that Mete will just be an improved Josh Gorges and probably Romanov will be competing for his spot (#4-5). It's nothing to write home about yet.

 

[A55P2]

Sure, my preliminary evaluation is that Mete will just be an improved Josh Gorges and probably Romanov will be competing for his spot (#4-5). It's nothing to write home about yet.

It's not my evaluation. Far from it. It's also not the Canadiens evaluation at all. Mete is 21 and plays very well and you compare him to Gorges. Alright, I guess I don't have to add anything here.

 

[vokiel]

It's not my evaluation. Far from it. It's also not the Canadiens evaluation at all. Mete is 21 and plays very well and you compare him to Gorges. Alright, I guess I don't have to add anything here.

If Mete has half the impact Gorges had with this club, he can pat himself on the back for a job well done.

 

[angusyoung]

If Mete has half the impact Gorges had with this club, he can pat himself on the back for a job well done.

If Mete has half the impact of JG,he won't be in the league for long,not nowadays.

Surprised no one has mentioned Otto Leskinen.

 

[ProspectsSTC]

Depth
none of them are nhl proven

1 has 0 goals in 120 games and is described as an offensive d-man
Yeah until they are NHLers they are prospects with no nhl games. Who cares about depth if none of them make it.

Maybe he's described that way by EA "Pavelski is faster than Byron" sports, but in reality, no, Mete is not an offensive defenseman.

 

[HabsWhiteKnightLOL]

Maybe he's described that way by EA "Pavelski is faster than Byron" sports, but in reality, no, Mete is not an offensive defenseman.

Bad news for you if hes not , hes not a good defensive d-man