I honestly thought he'd be shipped out, but seeing as the only replacement for lower cap hit would probably have had to be a rookie I can see why they signed him. I don't see any big problem with this signing or the money tbh, but then I am counting on a bit of improvement next season.
huh?
he's played roughly 25% with McDavid and less than 33% with Draisaitl
Drake Caggiula - Teammates - On Ice - Natural Stat Trick
That doesn't look like 25% or 33% to me...
151:31 w McD, 641:19 w/o McD
151:31 / (641:19+151:31) = (approx)
19% with McD
185:39 w Dra, 607:13 w/o Drai
185:39 / (607:13+185:39) = (approx)
23% with Drai
I always find it useful to also turn these numbers around, McD actaully spent only 13% of his EV TOI with Caggiula and Drai 18%. I don't see why this is such a big deal, but then again I don't think Caggiula is complete garbage.
He made those guys worse when he was with them. That is why he is bad. He's bad when he's in the bottom 6. And he makes our top 6 players worse when he plays with them.
It's not rocket science.
If you look at Corsi with and without then also Rattie made McD much worse in a similar way. I am not really that fond of this deal but you are using stats with waaay to few counts to be relevant, especially the GF%. 100-200 mins are not even remotely close to be enough for these types of evaluations.