Seras
Dubas supporter
Gudbranson is lousy. I really hope most Leafs fans can see that
Yeah I mean what could the gms know it's not like they have our expertise to draw upon.
Gudbranson is lousy. I really hope most Leafs fans can see that
Yup, i just posted in another post that my facts were wrong....i was mixing up a couple of stories and thought it was the Sedin thing that was shady....i tgink it was actually something that happened on Toronto that had me confused.Canucks finished 2nd last in the league in the 98-99 season, went down a spot in the lottery, picked third, traded a 1st and Bryan McCabe for 4th overall, traded the 4thOA plus two 3rds for 1st, then let the Thrashers pick first so that Burke didn't have to go up to the stage twice if they promised to take Patrik Stefan.
Ya, because God knows GMs never get it wrong....Yeah I mean what could the gms know it's not like they have our expertise to draw upon.
Leafs opinions are like stray cats...people will feed them once in a while but no one wants them....
Leafs make the playoffs and now fans are an authority on hl talent.
Gudbranson is playing 20 minutes a night and is coming off injury. He has been the Canucks best d man over the last few games.
The leafs won the lottery pick...beyond Matthews and Marner I would take any garbage from your team anyway.
Right. Except I don't want Polak there or Gudbranson. I want both guys not on the Leafs. I know we're not going to see Polak go anywhere, which is why I don't want to see yet another 3rd pairing guy in the mix.Not every player playing on a 3rd pairing is =. Gudbranson isn't great but he's better than Polak rather easily IMO.
You're not rebuilding, you are going into the playoffs for the second year in a row and want to improve on what you did last year. Gudbranson isn't an awesome defenseman but he gives you a guy who can break down the cycle on the wall down low and pin guys along the boards, and win the battles for the puck. He's built for that type of game, which the playoffs are all about. You also need more than 7d going in.
Putting a rookie or a guy who is really green in that spot and expecting good results is not the ideal thing to do. It's also not beneficial to have the same types of defenseman either. You need guys who can do different things. Again guddy isn't amazing and won't provide much offense but it makes sense to acquire a guy like this if the price is right.
But, what is the right price? If the Leafs offered a 3rd+Nielson (as reported) and Benning turned it down, then i hope Lou is done with it. I don't want to pay much more for a bottom pair guy.
My dude. I am a Canucks fan. But please take off the rose-colored glasses.
Gudbranson is not good. Last game he collected a goal, but looked awful otherwise. One play I vividly remember, which encapsulates the Gudbranson experience: Puck is dumped, he uses his size/reach to get to the puck first and establish body position. Then once he has a second to move the puck, he throws a terrible giveaway right up the middle to a Columbus player. Every time it seemed the Canucks were facing a barrage of shots in their own zone, I look and notice it's the Gudbranson/MDZ pairing.
He's just nowhere near good enough with the puck to play him as anything more than a 6D.
If the Leafs and TB want to send us assets for Guddy, then my all means, please allow them to.
I know my opinions aren't facts, but I do my best to call it like I see it. I think Vancouver has some good players but Gudbranson isn't one of themWell, I watch most Leafs games as well but I certainly am no scouting authority on an NHL player. But most Leafs fan seem to think their opinions are facts.
I know my opinions aren't facts, but I do my best to call it like I see it. I think Vancouver has some good players but Gudbranson isn't one of them
Yup. I'd love to get Tanev thoughAgreed. I don't think many people will say Gudbranson is the ideal target at all. He has a ton of warts. But he does bring an element that can be valuable in the playoffs. But yeah I get where you guys are coming from 100 percent. Hes slow and not very efficient with the puck, actually its more like a grenade when he gets it. Basically he would be able to offer some pushback on the bigger forwards youll face and that's about it.
Agreed. I don't think many people will say Gudbranson is the ideal target at all. He has a ton of warts. But he does bring an element that can be valuable in the playoffs. But yeah I get where you guys are coming from 100 percent. Hes slow and not very efficient with the puck, actually its more like a grenade when he gets it. Basically he would be able to offer some pushback on the bigger forwards youll face and that's about it.
Auston Matthews is a Toronto Maple Leaf.Minus Matthews you would still be at the bottom of the league before you won the lottery pick.
What do you think a plausible trade for him looks like?Yup. I'd love to get Tanev though
I don't know if there's one to be made. He's more valuable than Kapanen but less value than Nylander, and we don't really have an asset in between that would be worthwhile for both sidesWhat do you think a plausible trade for him looks like?
I would add our 1st to Kapanen...Nucks fans want Liljgren though....which i would pass on.I don't know if there's one to be made. He's more valuable than Kapanen but less value than Nylander, and we don't really have an asset in between that would be worthwhile for both sides
You just described Polak. Excpt Polak isnt slow. But holy ****, can the man ever ice the puck for no damn reason. He's allergic to the puck.
Is Gudbranson actually 'slow'? I've barely watched the Canucks for the past few seasons, and don't really notice these things anyways, but I'm just thinking a guy wouldn't be a 3rd overall draft pick if he didn't have a good toolset. I've been going with the assumption that his problems are more hockey IQ and that for all his supposed size and physicality he's actually been pretty soft with the Canucks.
Sharks were stupid to pay that price, but they were cup contenders going all in. I'm sure if the Nucks can find a desperate enough team, they can make Gudbranson deal worth their while. I wouldn't bank on that team being the Leafs though.So just to go back in time a few years ago, Roman Polak and Nick Spalling got 2 2nds and you had to take a player back, so I think its fair to say Gudbranson could fetch a 2nd rounder under the right circumstances.
Gudbranson is not slow. he actually has good footwork for such a big guy.So just to go back in time a few years ago, Roman Polak and Nick Spalling got 2 2nds and you had to take a player back, so I think its fair to say Gudbranson could fetch a 2nd rounder under the right circumstances.
Well, hes not a burner haha. I think hes pretty slow in todays NHL yeah. He had a decent game lastnight physicality wise too. He threw a few pretty good hits and was engaged, but his outlet passes leave something to be desired.
Most Leafs fans aren't interested because he's on Polak's level. Most Leafs fans aren't interested because he would be playing Polak minutes. We don't like Polak playing Polak minutes, why in the world would we want another guy in the mix who could potentially get overused and overexposed by Babs.
You don't know what you are talking about, which is fine, but when you attribute your ignorance to "most Leaf fans" you do a disservice to the Leaf fans that populate these boards that actually are aware of the abilities and qualities of players that wear uniforms that don't have a Maple Leaf on the front.
The only reason Polak plays is because of his penalty-killing skills. If Gudbranson moves to the Leafs he takes Polak's spot in the lineup and therefore his role as top 3 penalty killing Dman. Gud will have to be as good as, or better, on the PK. I have no idea about Guddy's PK skills. How well does he perform on the PK?So just to go back in time a few years ago, Roman Polak and Nick Spalling got 2 2nds and you had to take a player back, so I think its fair to say Gudbranson could fetch a 2nd rounder under the right circumstances.
Well, hes not a burner haha. I think hes pretty slow in todays NHL yeah. He had a decent game lastnight physicality wise too. He threw a few pretty good hits and was engaged, but his outlet passes leave something to be desired.
The only reason Polak plays is because of his penalty-killing skills.
Easy...because Polak being good at anything related to hockey is a fallacy....well, except icings.....he's really very good at icings.His penalty killing skills? Then how come the Leafs penalty kill with or without him is virtually identical? What skills?