RanOutOfTime
Registered User
- Nov 4, 2017
- 71
- 52
Looking at the real trade pieces, it really was 9th for Conor Garland. Oel for our cap dumps. Would you guys have traded 9th overall for Conor Garland or Sam Reinhart?
Last edited:
Reinhart is soft, relies on the PP for production and is an entitled little d$ckLooking at the real trade pieces, it really was 9th for Conor Garland. Oel for our cap dumps. Would you guys have traded 9th overall for Conor Garland or Sam Reinhart?
Also a much better personGarland is a better play driver and a better player
Wow, I did not expect everyone to pick Garland. I thought Reinhart did pretty well last year when Eichel went down and though it would be a mixed poll. He's also more proven then Garland
guess who they’d pick if the Canucks had traded for Reinhart
100% LMAO
Canucks fans are so blinded with homerism.
Reinhart has been a consistent top six forward on a dumpster fire team for the past five years. He can play both center and wing and has shown the ability to drive his own line.
Reinhart is a better player than Garland at this point. Canucks fans are just wildin' as per usual...
Garland had a higher PPG last year, has a more well rounded game, will come at a lower cap hit, and is (slightly) younger.
Reinhart also plays center, allowing the Canucks the flexibility to run 3 lines that can score.To play devils advocate though:
But I love Hogs, and Garland is just an older Hogs, which is great
- Garland is less proven, might just be a flash in the pan season last year
- Heavier game smaller/lighter body == injuries/decline earlier faster than Reinhart
Also plays center, allowing the Canucks the flexibility to run 3 lines that can score.
I still voted garland though and would have regardless of this trade, he's one of my fav players to watch.
I meant Reinhart does, sorry I should've clarified. Was just jumping off your devil's advocate point.What? Garland plays center? When did that happen? I thought he only played wing with dvorak/schmaltz as his center