Craz1bo1
Registered User
- Feb 9, 2013
- 4,547
- 110
He seemed to be on a 40 point pace last year and was a PPG in the AHL
Is he terrible defensively or something? Getting cushy minutes?
I don't know, but almost positive he will get his chance with the twins before Eriksson... or burrows.
He seemed to be on a 40 point pace last year and was a PPG in the AHL
Is he terrible defensively or something? Getting cushy minutes?
His shot generation has been elite, but his shot suppression has been awful. He's kind of all over the map in his short NHL career. Albeit these are off of a very small sample size, this seems to be a player who could still go either way.
I like the pickup, simply because why not? It's a free asset, and if nothing more it helps provide some depth in the AHL by allowing us to send down Chaput or Megna.
Maybe blanket him with Tanev since we're in desperate need of offence from the back end? Or I wonder if there's a chance to try him at forward since he has such a good quick shot
There was a poster or two here who were pretty disappointed when we didn't take him on waivers last time
What does anybody know about him?
Boucher already is a forward...
Whoa, what? We actually claimed someone? Madness!
Boucher's been around the waiver block this year for sure; seems like a capable AHL player/depth NHL player.
Wonder if the plan is to try and sneak him down to Utica or, more hopefully, keep him as a depth player and return one of Megna or Chaput.
According to Twitter, Gaunce is the only FW that can be sent down without waivers so I'm betting he goes down.
According to Twitter, Gaunce is the only FW that can be sent down without waivers so I'm betting he goes down.