The best part of this joke offer is the implication that you wouldn't trade De Haan for the 9th OA if Tippett wasn't available.
Never said he is the same now. ...
Maybe I'm missing something. Why would the Islanders trade for Nyquist to take 4.75M on their cap when they could sweeten the pot and get a superior player in Duchene for 6M. Both are UFAs in 2 years.
To be fair CDH should probably get 4 mil in his next contract so the salaries will end up being close enough. And yeah a deal involving Nyquist and de Haan is pretty fair, all in all. That said, Detroit posters prob don't know our biggest need is 2C.
Maybe I'm missing something. Why would the Islanders trade for Nyquist to take 4.75M on their cap when they could sweeten the pot and get a superior player in Duchene for 6M. Both are UFAs in 2 years.
if we're offering de haan we'd probably be packaging him for a 2nd line c who can take pressure off tavares
As a Wings fan I would absolutely love to get de Haan. I personally think he's underrated. I would definitely give up Nyquist for him.
Based on the rumored price Salic wants for Duchene it'd have to be a hell of a sweetener. The assets to get Nyquist are paltry compared to the truckload of assets you'd have to part with for Duchene.
As a Wings fan I would absolutely love to get de Haan. I personally think he's underrated. I would definitely give up Nyquist for him.
As a Wings fan I would absolutely love to get de Haan. I personally think he's underrated. I would definitely give up Nyquist for him.
I don't imagine you'll get very favorable responses to moving Hronek, at this point. While De Haan would be nice, I'd be loathe to give up a promising 19 year old D prospect for him and yet another forward.
Really, I wouldn't give up any of our prospects for reasonable-return over-25 players right now, but I'm on the "this isn't and shouldn't be a playoff team next year" side of things.
I haven't read this whole post, but I've looked at the NYI roster and feel that Snow is either
A) doing nothing and then tossing a pick to Vegas to grab someone like Hickey or Chimera as opposed to likelier candidates Hamonic, de Haan, Nelson and Strome.
or
B) moving several of those four, if not all of them.
de Haan is a guy who is a top flight #4 at worst. And like some say, he's looking like a breakout player very soon.
Nelson looked good at times working with Larkin and is generally a player who I could see Detroit having lots of interest in.
I'd suggest something a bit bigger. What do Red Wings fans say?
de Haan and Nelson
for
Nyquist, Hronek, and picks 69 & 100
No one likes to give up picks or heady prospects, but both Nelson and de Haan have plenty of years ahead of them, don't break the bank and each has more productive upside.
For the Isles, fans don't necessarily want to see these players go, but then Snow would be protecting Nyquist as opposed to both Nelson and de Haan while hopefully getting a future de Haan in Hronek and adding a few midround possibilities to the slight 5 picks he currently has.
Just a thought...
I think most Detroit fans feel this way, however, I can see Holland doing the opposite. I don't think we should be moving our prospects unless we are doing it to acquire higher end prospects through packages.
bozak is in fact not our man
de Haan and NelsonI haven't read this whole post, but I've looked at the NYI roster and feel that Snow is either
A) doing nothing and then tossing a pick to Vegas to grab someone like Hickey or Chimera as opposed to likelier candidates Hamonic, de Haan, Nelson and Strome.
or
B) moving several of those four, if not all of them.
de Haan is a guy who is a top flight #4 at worst. And like some say, he's looking like a breakout player very soon.
Nelson looked good at times working with Larkin and is generally a player who I could see Detroit having lots of interest in.
I'd suggest something a bit bigger. What do Red Wings fans say?
No one likes to give up picks or heady prospects, but both Nelson and de Haan have plenty of years ahead of them, don't break the bank and each has more productive upside.
For the Isles, fans don't necessarily want to see these players go, but then Snow would be protecting Nyquist as opposed to both Nelson and de Haan while hopefully getting a future de Haan in Hronek and adding a few midround possibilities to the slight 5 picks he currently has.
Just a thought...
de Haan and Nelson
for
Nyquist, Hronek, and picks 69 & 100
Counter would be de Haan + Strome + 46 OA
for
Nyquist + Saarijarvi + 40 OA + 100 OA
de Haan and Nelson
for
Nyquist, Hronek, and picks 69 & 100
Counter would be de Haan + Strome + 46 OA
for
Nyquist + Saarijarvi + 40 OA + 100 OA
Yes - The Isles would have to add a "hell of a sweetener" and that's fine...To a point. I get the impression that Sakic is asking for the moon for Duchene because the team has gotten historically bad in the few years since he became GM. Plus he had the Ryan O'Reilly to deal with and that deal didn't go swimmingly for him.
I maintain that snow should offer Sakic a choice of the following (3) assets for Duchene:
Nelson
De Haan
Strome
Bellows
Dal Colle
2017 1st rounder
If Sakic isn't ok with trading Duchene for (3) of those assets, then snow should tell him there's no deal and move on. That doesn't mean move on to a de Haan/Nyquist deal. While the value is close, Nyquist doesn't help the Isles as much as de Haan does (and de Haan is harder to replace).
is it reasonable to think the isles would protect 5 defensemen in the 8 skaters/1 goalie format? i may be in the minority, but i'd see boychuk/leddy/hamonic/de haan/pulock as 5 guys i would want to keep and would prefer losing 1 of strome or nelson.
is it reasonable to think the isles would protect 5 defensemen in the 8 skaters/1 goalie format? i may be in the minority, but i'd see boychuk/leddy/hamonic/de haan/pulock as 5 guys i would want to keep and would prefer losing 1 of strome or nelson.