Am I missing the boat this badly on Petry? I like his mobility, I like his puck skills, but I don't like him coming from Edmonton or shoving a lot of money at a guy with his track record. And then putting him on the top pairing. Maybe he takes off in a better system, with a better team around him. I don't know. Have to wonder what we end up doing with XO, Sproul, Jensen, and Backman. I figure one of them would be in that Yandle deal (along with one of Quincey/Smith).
I like the idea of re-working the blueline. I'm not a fan of what we have going on. At the very least it'd be interesting.
You're not missing anything. I was trying to piece together a blueline without Smith, Quincey, and Kindl while also not including guys who aren't on the trade market or are unrealistic acquisitions salary wise. What I came up with is that Yandle is available and Petry is a probably guy the Wings could lure in.
But I doubt Holland parts with the appropriate pieces for Yandle, so it's far more likely a guy like Zidlicky or Petry are the big additions coming with the hopes XO or Marchenko can carry some slack.
I think the Wings need to replace at least 2 of the players on the blueline, maybe 3. Ideally with guys that shoot right and have some more offensive gusto to their game. Petry isn't that guy, but Yandle would be. With Kronwall, Yandle, and DeKeyser on each pairing, you at least have 1 guy you know could potentially set up a nice play.
At the Wings peak, they had Lidstrom, Rafalski, and Kronwall. All guys logging over 20 minutes a game and all guys who were good for over 40 points, at least. In 2008 those 3 guys combined for 160 points. That's a lofty goal, no question, but it's something to begin to aim for with production.
This year, the top 3 scoring Wings defenders are on pace for 92 points. Ouch. Yandle, for all the critics against him, gives an offensive weapon this team hasn't seen since Rafaslki and Lidstrom.
For the record I'd totally be thrilled with Green, too, but I doubt he gets moved this deadline so he's a summer concern.
He's bad. Want to get a ton of scoring from the blueline? Put a forward there. You might even get better defense from one of our forwards than you'd get from Yandle.
This is extremely hyperbolic. He's bad? If Yandle is bad, then holy hell, our blueline is a national emergency DEFCON level disaster. Yandle played in a strict defensive system his entire career, one that made Bryzgalov and Mike Smith look like big contract goalies. He's a weapon in the offensive zone, and that's how he's used, but to think a forward could take his spot or move the puck like him from the backend is completely missing the point of what makes Yandle one of the league's premier puck movers year after year.