when i say "forcing," i'm really just referring to the fact that lou did not start the conversation about the change. if it were COMPLETELY up to him, i truly believe he'd still hold the position.
he was approached, obliged, reached a compromise. and this is the end result.
Maybe, maybe not.
Regardless of who spoke on the subject first, Lou is a shrewd businessman - that much we can agree on. A solid, viable organization does not exist without a contingency plan and succession planning. Lou did not just start thinking about what happens if he were to a) get hit by a bus b)start to take a lesser role c)groom someone to replace him d) and so on...
He also knows that once word gets out that he's thinking about stepping back from the job it becomes an ever-present line of questioning from the media so he would never slowly bring up the topic until something was decided so I am not surprised by the surprise factor itself on the move.
So to take your scenario and tweak it slightly; I'm sure there was discussion even if a very quick and short one when the new owners came aboard about Lou's plans and tenure. Did something change from that original discussion? Maybe, probably even. Was it something major or just a re-visit on the topic once Lou and/or ownership saw Shero get axed? Who knows. Maybe it was started when DeBoer got fired.
So maybe. Maybe Lou went to them first to get thoughts on Shero. Maybe Lou sped up his own timeline so long as he could stay to oversee Shero instead of making a clean break in 3 more years. Maybe they came to Lou with a windfall decision that Shero is the man they want and want RIGHT NOW and pulled the plug on Lou altogether. Or maybe they wanted Lou to vet Shero as a vote of confidence in his final act of loyalty to the team. It's all maybe. I just feel Lou would be as tight lipped as ever if there was the slightest bit of conflict in how this went down.
Lou is if anything one to stay more silent than vocal - especially in the midst of scandal as we saw during the investigation and penalty phase of the Kovalchuk contract. Am I wrong? It sure seems that way to me.
So for him to speak up in support of Shero so much, and specifically say this;
Lamoriello said the decision was “100 percent” his, and that it wasn’t a case where the team’s ownership forced him out. The Devils were sold to Philadelphia 76ers owner Josh Harris and business partner David Blitzer in 2013.
He cited his age (72) as a consideration, but ultimately felt getting an executive like Shero in place was for the best for the organization. And since Shero was in high demand, he had to make the hire now.
and to then speak to the Toronto reporter and others it has the effect of stripping away that cloud of scandal far more than build on it. But then I feel that there is 'much iron in Lou's words for all Comanche to see' so fault me for believing Lou too much if you want. I take his word more than a media person that has motives to build up a story.
We'll see eventually - that much is guaranteed. No secret if truly born of scandal will stay one for long.