Oliver Bjorkstrand was traded for a 3rd and a 5th. Regardless of who the GM is, your team is held within the constraints of the current market. Trade Yamamoto? Sure. But who is giving you value for him?
When I was suggesting that we trade Jesse Puljujarvi this summer, I was targeting Filip Zadina, a younger, cheaper version of him with less of a track record of production. I'm even more willing to make that trade now that Zadina's been struggling.
I don't disagree with the idea that we need upgrades on the lesser impactful parts of the roster, but teams aren't going to necessarily give us value for the underperforming players on our roster.
And fact of the matter is that Yamamoto scored 40 points last season. Puljujarvi scored 35. If you move them, you have to replace that. You rush trade any of those guys in a weak market and you're looking at another Strome for Spooner deal.
Instead of struggling players, here's a thought ... maybe try someone who can actually score a goal? Like what do our scouts even do?
How did they come to the conclusion that Yamamoto and Puljujarvi are better than like Domi and Kubalik and Strome?
We've known for a long time that Puljujarvi and Yamamoto are mentally fragile players with suspect NHL tools and prone to being inconsistent and dragging down even McDavid and Draisaitl.
They just don't have a great level of skill and if I'm being honest, Alex Chiasson and Drake Caggiula could score 40 points too if you stapled them to McDavid or Draisaitl.
The other difference between this situation and the Strome-Eberle-Spooner thing is there literally were multiple players available for about the same money just sitting there to be had.
You can't go anywhere with this much dead cap on the books every year, too many players getting paid several times more to give you Jhujar Khaira level production.