MrMaster
Registered User
- Apr 20, 2016
- 815
- 305
2# line center i would tryGive him all of the shifts.
2# line center i would tryGive him all of the shifts.
I just think having him play on the PK at all is a huge waste.Why not both? Team isn't going anywhere this season. There's 0 downside to experimenting a bit -- let's see what Dahlin can do.
Wtf? I want him playing everywhereI just think having him play on the PK at all is a huge waste.
I just think having him play on the PK at all is a huge waste.
He'll also have to work on dropping the gloves if he wants be in the same conversation as Orr.What’s the waste of giving him some more experience battling and focusing on defense? Not to mention the utter threat he could be to spring someone or take off himself.
I don’t learn or teach him anything special this year by giving an extra couple even strength shifts where he might get an extra point or two. Clearly this organization hasn’t been worried about winning this year, so it’s not a team concern.
Let him work on the pk, at a time when he can screw up and it literally doesn’t matter.
Next year I expect him to eat up some pk. You can’t be Bobby Orr 2.0 and not pk.
He'll also have to work on dropping the gloves if he wants be in the same conversation as Orr.
Agreed. This is one thing Housley got right, frankly.I just think having him play on the PK at all is a huge waste.
If there is nothing at stake what would it hurt to play him there? I don’t really care one way or another but now is the time to try all kinds of things precisely because there is nothing at stake anymore. Not that I expect to see much of that from our coach.Agreed. This is one thing Housley got right, frankly.
Dahlin has been getting > 20 minutes routinely for quite a while, averaging 21:10 for the season. I don't see how adding PK to his work load this late in the season, with nothing at stake, would benefit anyone. Next year, sure, let's ease PK minutes into his game.
I see an overused, tired player out there often enough already. Let's not risk anything with our future Norris candidate in meaningless games in a lost season.If there is nothing at stake what would it hurt to play him there? I don’t really care one way or another but now is the time to try all kinds of things precisely because there is nothing at stake anymore. Not that I expect to see much of that from our coach.
I see an overused, tired player out there often enough already. Let's not risk anything with our future Norris candidate in meaningless games in a lost season.
What could possibly be risked by playing him on the PK? Is he going to break? This is a pretty weak and frankly silly argument you’re putting forth.I see an overused, tired player out there often enough already. Let's not risk anything with our future Norris candidate in meaningless games in a lost season.
Be sure to enable subtitles
As stated, I think he's getting plenty of minutes as is. What's your upper bound?What could possibly be risked by playing him on the PK? Is he going to break? This is a pretty weak and frankly silly argument you’re putting forth.
As stated, I think he's getting plenty of minutes as is. What's your upper bound?
Be sure to enable subtitles
Lots of interesting stuff in there, apart from the "fan boy" questions.
Asked about if he had to be traded where he'd like to go "I want to stay in Buffalo, but I'll answer like this - anywhere but Toronto." Nice.
I just think our team has the best chance of possession and scoring when Rasmus is on the ice, and I don't want to waste any of his minutes in situations where both of those are essentially guaranteed to not happen.
You put Dahlin on the pk *because* he's a gamebreaking talent. Let him hone his defensive skills and allow the team a greater threat for shorthanded opportunities.