Rank the divisions

Pandaman11

Registered User
Dec 3, 2009
2,802
1,297
Columbus is currently first in the Central with 2 wins and 5 losses :laugh:

(and yes, I know the reason, but it still looks funny)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tuggy

joe dirte

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
9,430
3,559
Brings me back to the 80s when the Adams division had Quebec-Hartford so making the playoffs was easy while the Patrick division had 1 more team and every season a team in the Patrick didnt make it because of that extra team. Huge difference 7 vs 8 teams.
1988 last in Patrick would have been 2nd in Norris. Plenty of such oddities in those unbalanced divisions.

Fans of McDavid sometimes talk about not even Mario Lemieux being good enough to get the Pens to the playoffs for about 3 or 4 years.

What they always fail to recognize is the playoff format, and there were teams with 20 to 30 less points making the playoffs those years, because of playoff format and the fact that the Pens were in the best division. Literally 20 to 30 points less.
 

The Winter Soldier

Registered User
Apr 4, 2011
70,823
21,053
But it sort of depends on the team right? It all comes down to your immediate competition. There’s 4 spots per division so how many teams are you better than?

In the East a good team is going to miss. Boston, Washington, Philly, Boston, Pittsburgh were all top 10 teams last year and someone is the odd team out. I know Boston has sustained some losses in personnel but still they won the presidents trophy last year. Then you have NYI who made the ECF and NYR who is a very promising young team that added the 1OA in Laf and if Igor is the real deal in net they will be very good. NJ is the ‘weakest’ team and even they aren’t a push over.
I agree with this. The East is the division of death with the realignment. There are no easy spots in this group. It is what it is, but there are going to be some good teams that do not make the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GIN ANTONIC

X66

114-110
Aug 18, 2008
13,578
7,445
East is easily the toughest.

The other 3 are interchangeable.
 

MSSLYNX

Registered User
Jul 27, 2009
4,009
917
Not sure what to make of fact East leads league with 9 ot losses. And only 1 team below .500

League-wide i believe standings will stretch quite rapidly and tanking could be quite a thing early on.
Reminds me of NFL nfc east getting in but early exit.
 

A1LeafNation

Obsession beats talent everytime!!
Oct 17, 2010
27,489
17,496
East North Central West

Technically we could see a Toronto vs Boston final.
 

rosscow

Registered User
Apr 5, 2015
714
223
West 3 good teams
East 3 good teams
Central 2 good teams
North 1 good team
 

BFLO

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 3, 2015
4,273
3,895
The 5th and 6th place teams in the east are likely top 10 overall in the league.

Imagine swapping the Sabres to the north for the Leafs. Leafs would struggle to even make the playoffs in the east. And Sabres would be a solid contender in the North.
 

983 others

Registered User
Aug 26, 2009
792
1,064
East
(huge gap)
West
Central

North

North is by far the worst. There isn’t a single actual contender in the entire division.

I expect there to be huge individual numbers from the North and for people to point to that as a sign of strength or difficulty of the division as a whole, when it’s really the opposite.
 

Jee

uwu
Aug 25, 2006
30,098
12,890
Montréal
East
(huge gap)
West
Central

North

North is by far the worst. There isn’t a single actual contender in the entire division.

I expect there to be huge individual numbers from the North and for people to point to that as a sign of strength or difficulty of the division as a whole, when it’s really the opposite.

I bet this will age well.
 

b in vancouver

Registered User
Jul 28, 2005
7,846
5,698
Brings me back to the 80s when the Adams division had Quebec-Hartford so making the playoffs was easy while the Patrick division had 1 more team and every season a team in the Patrick didnt make it because of that extra team. Huge difference 7 vs 8 teams.
1988 last in Patrick would have been 2nd in Norris. Plenty of such oddities in those unbalanced divisions.

I get what you're saying but don't pick on The Adams Division. They at least had 2 or 3 of the top teams in the league every year. Making the playoffs was easier but Boston and Montreal had to meet in the playoffs for a ridiculous 9 straight years as two of the top teams. Then you get The Patrick.
Similar to The Smythe with Calgary and Edmonton. Easier to make it but then you have a yearly date in the 2nd round
But then they at least got to coast through the conference Final.

Because The Norris was a joke. One season The Leafs made the playoffs one point out of last place while The Nords, Pens and NYR(?) all missed with 20-30 points more than them.
 

Grate n Colorful Oz

Hutson Hawk
Jun 12, 2007
35,310
32,163
Hockey Mecca
Too early to tell.

It's not too early to know how weak the division is defensively, nor having any teams that did great last year, best was Edm in 12th. Aside from the Habs, the other 6 teams had average offseason additions/substractions, while Edmonton suffered a huge loss. Habs got better, but are digging out of 24th place last year and their only gauge so far to assess if they're better, are the same weak-ass defenses the Habs were already good against, safe for Edmonton WITH Klefbom.

It's a very weak division and I can't believe the leafs and Habs homers putting it 2nd out of 4. It's 3rd at best. Every other division had at least one team in the top 10 last year
 

Pyrophorus

Registered User
Jun 1, 2009
26,197
2,905
Eastern GTA
It's not too early to know how weak the division is defensively, nor having any teams that did great last year, best was Edm in 12th. Aside from the Habs, the other 6 teams had average offseason additions/substractions, while Edmonton suffered a huge loss. Habs got better, but are digging out of 24th place last year and their only gauge so far to assess if they're better, are the same weak-ass defenses the Habs were already good against, safe for Edmonton WITH Klefbom.

It's a very weak division and I can't believe the leafs and Habs homers putting it 2nd out of 4. It's 3rd at best. Every other division had at least one team in the top 10 last year

The North leader, leads the league currently?
 

Jee

uwu
Aug 25, 2006
30,098
12,890
Montréal
It's not too early to know how weak the division is defensively, nor having any teams that did great last year, best was Edm in 12th. Aside from the Habs, the other 6 teams had average offseason additions/substractions, while Edmonton suffered a huge loss. Habs got better, but are digging out of 24th place last year and their only gauge so far to assess if they're better, are the same weak-ass defenses the Habs were already good against, safe for Edmonton WITH Klefbom.

It's a very weak division and I can't believe the leafs and Habs homers putting it 2nd out of 4. It's 3rd at best. Every other division had at least one team in the top 10 last year

I'm not talking about the division rankings, I'm talking about his take on the North division having no contenders. It's waaaaay too early to tell.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad