Post-Game Talk: Rangers @ Sharks: "Light Schedule" Edition

[Tawnos]

No, they didn't make the right call. Yes, you can say 100% that it crossed the line. Why? Logic. Common sense. Obviousness.

Angles, depth perception, blah blah blah you can more than see how much behind the line the glove is. And we have use of more than just one picture and one angle. From the top down view, you can totally see how far into the net the glove is. From the other angle, you can clearly see where inside the glove the puck is. Put the two together, using, ya know, like, common sense and logic and stuff, and you've got definitive. Period. It was a huge blown call that could've ultimately cost us the game. Thank god it didn't. Toronto is pathetic.

Toronto isn't allowed to use deductive logic.

 

[aufheben]

So...Papa John's playoff avatars?

 

[ReggieDunlop68]

Lockout year tho... Less worry about tiring out

We should lose a bunch to get some rest.

 

[RGY]

Papa Johns marketing/research team looked at Rangers last 5 seasons of goal scoring and thought **** no they cant consistently score three or more goals for this promotion to be used consistently...

 

[Nanaki]

So...Papa John's playoff avatars?

Reminiscent of a couple of years ago which was awesome.

Papa Johns marketing/research team looked at Rangers last 5 seasons of goal scoring and thought **** no they cant consistently score three or more goals for this promotion to be used consistently...

Mistakes were made.

 

[Ex Officer Friendly]

Papa Johns marketing/research team looked at Rangers last 5 seasons of goal scoring and thought **** no they cant consistently score three or more goals for this promotion to be used consistently...

its ok next year will be Knicks wins and they know that wont be more than 20 times

 

[Fugazy]

Yeah yeah yeah this team keeps winning but when are they going to actually prove their worth?

 

[Mac n Gs]

its ok next year will be Knicks wins and they know that wont be more than 20 times

20? That's being generous

 

[Ex Officer Friendly]

20? That's being generous

I hate to be technical butttt I said no more than 20 :p

 

[Leetch3]

No, they didn't make the right call. Yes, you can say 100% that it crossed the line. Why? Logic. Common sense. Obviousness.

Angles, depth perception, blah blah blah you can more than see how much behind the line the glove is. And we have use of more than just one picture and one angle. From the top down view, you can totally see how far into the net the glove is. From the other angle, you can clearly see where inside the glove the puck is. Put the two together, using, ya know, like, common sense and logic and stuff, and you've got definitive. Period. It was a huge blown call that could've ultimately cost us the game. Thank god it didn't. Toronto is pathetic.

common sense and logic are not part of the equation...the rules do not allow you to make assumptions. obviously if the puck is in the glove and the glove is in the net, then the puck must be in the net. but the rules state that you have to actually see the puck inside the net. the rule should allow for common sense but it doesn't

 

[The Gloaming]

Holy ****, just checked Stubhub prices for Tuesday's game. Absolutely insane. $210+ just to get into the building.

 

[Mac n Gs]

Holy ****, just checked Stubhub prices for Tuesday's game. Absolutely insane. $210+ just to get into the building.

Just wait until they play in March in the Coliseum for the last time. Those tickets are going to be absolutely absurd.

 

[NYRangerFan*]

Holy ****, just checked Stubhub prices for Tuesday's game. Absolutely insane. $210+ just to get into the building.

They are pricing the die hards out of the building. Smh

 

[trueblue9441]

They are pricing the die hards out of the building. Smh

who is they? this isnt the rangers pricing those tickets. its called supply and demand

 

[NYRangerFan*]

who is they? this isnt the rangers pricing those tickets. its called supply and demand

No need to get all technical. You know what i mean. Thats why there are a bunch of businessmen at hockey games, too much money for tickets.

 

[The Gloaming]

who is they? this isnt the rangers pricing those tickets. its called supply and demand

One could argue that if the face value of the tickets was lower, the second market prices would be lower as well.

But it's really not surprising that this game is priced as such. Two rival teams neck and neck in the standings. But it's funny how the January 27th game at the Coliseum is half as expensive.

 

[ReggieDunlop68]

One could argue that if the face value of the tickets was lower, the second market prices would be lower as well.

But it's really not surprising that this game is priced as such. Two rival teams neck and neck in the standings. But it's funny how the January 27th game at the Coliseum is half as expensive.

Surprising? Have you driven through Roosevelt after an overtime game?

 

[SnowblindNYR]

What are our advanced stats since we sat Glass, the last few games?

 

[Thirty One]

What are our advanced stats since we sat Glass, the last few games?

+ a billion

 

[SnowblindNYR]

+ a billion

Damn it, I got excited that I'd get a real answer when I saw your handle.

Seriously, though.

 

[GoAwayPanarin]

What are our advanced stats since we sat Glass, the last few games?

Since the beginning of December (Tampa Loss) Rangers are running a Fenwick Close of 53.8, good for 6th in the league behind LA, Detroit, NYI, Tampa and Florida of all teams.

Its not a huge sample size, but since you asked...

 

[SnowblindNYR]

Since the beginning of December (Tampa Loss) Rangers are running a Fenwick Close of 53.8, good for 6th in the league behind LA, Detroit, NYI, Tampa and Florida of all teams.

Its not a huge sample size, but since you asked...

Damn, thanks. That's impressive, does that include the Tampa loss?

 

[GoAwayPanarin]

Sure does, and the stop playing after going up 2-0 in the first period only to lose 3-2 despite getting like an entire periods worth of 5 on 3 time against Detroit that came after it.


That game still pisses me the **** off . They've turned it around big time since then.

 

[Raspewtin]

Damn, thanks. That's impressive, does that include the Tampa loss?

Wouldn't surprise me, we were the better team that game.

Also, Glass played 8 games during that stretch. Just taking him out of the lineup spikes our possession up.

 

[Mac n Gs]

Wouldn't surprise me, we were the better team that game.

Also, Glass played 8 games during that stretch. Just taking him out of the lineup spikes our possession up.

What are our stats with him out of the lineup? It's a small sample size, but it'll still be interesting to see the difference.