Thirty One
Safe is safe.
- Dec 28, 2003
- 28,981
- 24,354
Like he has his whole coaching career, he won't. He's been blessed with the best goaltending of this generation his entire tenure in VAN and NY. If Hank was even average in the 2015 series vs Washington or the first two months of 2016 AV would be long gone.
Just to address this again because it's one of the few posts with actual substance...
If a teams clogging the neutral zone that would mean dump it in and go get it instead of trying to carry the puck over the blue line. failed carry ins while trapping the neutral zone == odd man/rush chances the other way.
Is that something you've noticed with this team? Asking honestly because I haven't. They will indeed dump the puck in of the opposition forces them too. Now he question might you ask is why are they bad at getting it backs and retrieving it after dumping it in? It could be a lack of proper coaching on positioning and spacing of the forwards.
It could be forwards making bad reads even with good coaching and game plan. It could be just bad matchup for our peronnsel.
The point is me you or anyone else doesn't know what the coach is doing stategically and adjustment wise even tho we lead ourselves to Believe we do.
Ok, except that first part isn't true. Almost every damn team tries to trap in the neutral zone against us.
So the Rangers' best player being their best player benefited the coach? What a revelation!
Well, it sort of is a revelation. If this was something that was known, that Hank makes everyone around him look good, then you don't re-sign Girardi and Staal to the contracts they got.
Different issue. I was reading posts just last week about how AV ruined goaltenders like Luongo and Lundqvist. Its BS, like most of these arguments about how "terrible" of a coach AV is. Now its the goaltenders that are pretty much solely responsible for the very large # of games AV has won over the past decade. I look forward to the next contrived and idiotic argument as to why our coach, who continues to win games by the bushel, sucks so badly.
A truly good coach wins without any good players.
every coach needs talent to win and in most sports needs elite talent!!! Basketball, Football, hockey. Im not a big baseball fan but i assume the kc royal roster wasn't full of elite talent but they won. The penguins last year are not winning the cup without crosby. the denver broncos weren't winning without von miller and the cavs aren't winning without lebron no matter who the coach is.
It's impossible to argue with your main point, because I'm not in the locker room, so we can just let this one slide, yeah?
I don't know if this is true, there are teams that try and run-and-gun with us. But, even if it was true, some teams are good at this, and the Rangers struggle against those teams.
Well, it sort of is a revelation. If this was something that was known, that Hank makes everyone around him look good, then you don't re-sign Girardi and Staal to the contracts they got.
And belichek would not have won 4 championships without a star quarterback (I.e. Cleveland). There relationship has definitely been a symbiotic one .
and (in a hypothetical situation where av was an nfl coach) av wouldnt have won a sb if he had brady because he would have kept playing drew bledsoe
A truly good team wins without any coaches
and (in a hypothetical situation where av was an nfl coach) av wouldnt have won a sb if he had brady because he would have kept playing drew bledsoe
Very very hypothetical and too be honest so would have 90 percent of the coaches out there or are u trying to compare the Adam clendening over Dan G to Tom Brady over Drew Bledsoe ? Don't think Adam clendening (although I like him) is the next Larry Robinson.
If you remember only reason Tom Brady was plugged in was because of Drew Bledsoes Injury. Who knows when and where he would have gotten the opportunity to start. The hit Mo Lewis of the put on him almost killed Bledsoe. Yes that's right. Cause him to have a hemothorax and make his abdominal cavity to fill with blood. In fact belichek kept Bledsoe in for a play after he got hit but had to come out cause something wasn't right as noticed by team doctor. So who knows what would have happened if Bledsoe wasn't Severly injured
Very very hypothetical and too be honest so would have 90 percent of the coaches out there or are u trying to compare the Adam clendening over Dan G to Tom Brady over Drew Bledsoe ? Don't think Adam clendening (although I like him) is the next Larry Robinson.
If you remember only reason Tom Brady was plugged in was because of Drew Bledsoes Injury. Who knows when and where he would have gotten the opportunity to start. The hit Mo Lewis of the put on him almost killed Bledsoe. Yes that's right. Cause him to have a hemothorax and make his abdominal cavity to fill with blood. In fact belichek kept Bledsoe in for a play after he got hit but had to come out cause something wasn't right as noticed by team doctor. So who knows what would have happened if Bledsoe wasn't Severly injured
Looking at the responses in this thread, you'd think we have been a lottery team for years.
and (in a hypothetical situation where av was an nfl coach) av wouldnt have won a sb if he had brady because he would have kept playing drew bledsoe
I know that Bledsoe was injured, but I'm talking when he got healthy. Brady wasn't even great during that Super Bowl run, that team was carried by it's defense. Belicheck could have easily just plugged Bledsoe back in when he was healthy, but he decided to stick with Brady. There's no doubt in my mind Beldsoe would have been AV's starter.
You've handled this situation very well, Bob Richards. I imagine Vigneault would have handled it similarly.I'm not sure how anyone can look at the former Brady/Bledsoe situation and think it can somehow be used to judge whether or not AV is the right coach for this hockey team.
Lets move on from that please.