just leave this here...
That's the greatest drivel I've ever heard. I mean what the ****? Sounds like somebody's losing it...
just leave this here...
When a team has a Phil Kessel and hes not mentioned as part of the core to build around, it says alot about that players presence on and off the ice.
Would love the goals that he brings ro the table but not anything else that he offers.
Hes as big a reason that team sucks as any. Floater that doesnt back check and in today's game you can't do that and expect to win
He's -7 less (or more whichever way you look at it) than Tanner Glass.
And The Thrill's break down is 243-263-506!
He is one of the most one way North American players I've ever seen. If Toronto moves him, it will be the second time a team did not think he was a key stone. Even with all his goals.
Which is really mind boggling because a lot of people say that AV is an idiot, and a bunch of the players have no "hockey IQ."
Corsi!
Kessel doesn't play 4th line minutes and is not on a team that has one of the best differentials in the NHL. I don't even want Kessel, but context...
AV is a very good coach with one major fault. He's too attached to some of "his guys" and too afraid of talented guys that sometimes make mistakes. Glass is a MAJOR black negative for him.
The greatest blown lead we've had all season? I mean it was 100% glass' fault on their tying goal, then he took a penalty and finally got benched for a shift or 2 with Kreider taking his place. And we pulled off the win anyway. Probably the happiest I've ever been when we gave up the lead. Screw glass
AV is a very good coach with one major fault. He's too attached to some of "his guys" and too afraid of talented guys that sometimes make mistakes.
I think so. I think that Henke, while not flashy, is the best. I think he covers up for a lot of the teams issues. The flaws of the team (giveaways, lack of winning puck battles, etc) are mediated by his presence.Would Hank really have made a difference though? None of those goals were really stoppable.
I think so. I think that Henke, while not flashy, is the best. I think he covers up for a lot of the teams issues. The flaws of the team (giveaways, lack of winning puck battles, etc) are mediated by his presence.
Not necessarily disagreeing. I meant the team as a whole, not a segment.The Rangers D are actually pretty good at winning puck battles 1 on 1. The wingers though aren't that good at it in their own zone which leads to some issues at times.
I mean, he has given some players room to run (like Kreider) but yeah also seems to be harsh on other players like Miller and to some extent Hayes (he just doesn't trust Hayes yet and I think a large part of it is faceoffs, but it's still dumb to leave him on the bench and play Glass more)
That's partially because only a foolish coach handles all of his players exactly the same. Doing it that way would just be bad people management.
And every coach in the league has "his" guys. That's not an AV thing.
Eh, special treatment warrants special ability. And the special ability Glass brings should fetch him the Hartford treatment...
That's the greatest drivel I've ever heard. I mean what the ****? Sounds like somebody's losing it...
Right, I'm just commenting. When the Rangers are playing well in sync they move the puck pretty well out of their zone. When they get out of sync and struggle they start making passes to where players aren't, guys lose battles, and then they panic and start just slapping at the puck which usually just knocks it right to an opposing player.
In a perfect world they'd always play in sync and the system would work flawlessly! Unfortunately it breaks down sometimes.
Unfortunately, I think that games like this underscore how much Henke can cover up. Without the security blanket, the play of this team gets exposed.
Great game by Hayes. Hoping that they keep him and Miller together and NOT trade Miller for some sort of rental.
AV is a very good coach with one major fault. He's too attached to some of "his guys" and too afraid of talented guys that sometimes make mistakes. Glass is a MAJOR black negative for him.
I think that, in the micro, AV is weak here. But in the macro this loyalty is good for team development. Players feel stability and a sense of place. This is good. And by the playoffs i think Glass will have a very secondary role. But he and his teammates will know they got a fair shake. Again, i think its clear that Glass does not belong in a cup contenders lineup. But in the big picture AV is letting nature take its course and the team grow tighter. His results speak for themself.