Agreed.
will be posting and moaning about how gallant doesn't play his best players enough mins and gives too much time to bums who shouldn't be out there.
And if they're right and Gallant is doing that, then what? How does that magically prove Quinn was right or wrong?
You're vehemently shooting down the idea of " just a 4 game sample size" and " you don't know the context of that moment in the clip you showed"
So wait. 4 game sample size is completely irrelevant and absolutely nothing during that sample could possibly matter at all...
Yet there's context in the couple of SHIFT sample size Quinn MAY have had in that one game?
And coaches routinely change entire lines based on small sample sizes consisting of a few games or even a few shifts?
My first response I tried to keep really level and Im trying to do that here but honestly as I read further and further it felt like you're just reaching for every excuse to turn away almost every criticism of Quinn. You're not even pointing out the good, you're just conjuring endless hypotheticals and ways to deflect pretty legitimate criticism.
And you're doing it so strongly that it really clashes with the lack of any real argument or evidence you're giving.
This board has a whipping boy thing and it can be bad bc of how irrational and overboard it can get.
It also has a holy saint thing where guys get defended no matter what by certain people. Our execs and Quinn were blindly defended by guys like TB and that crew. ADA somehow has his blind defenders, Hank had his (Literally no goal in any game was ever his fault lol). They're both just as bad.